Literature DB >> 15747039

Quantification of aortic valve area and left ventricular muscle mass in healthy subjects and patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis by MRI.

J Haimerl1, A Freitag-Krikovic, A Rauch, E Sauer.   

Abstract

MRI allows visualization and planimetry of the aortic valve orifice and accurate determination of left ventricular muscle mass, which are important parameters in aortic stenosis. In contrast to invasive methods, MRI planimetry of the aortic valve area (AVA) is flow independent. AVA is usually indexed to body surface area. Left ventricular muscle mass is dependent on weight and height in healthy individuals. We studied AVA, left ventricular muscle mass (LMM) and ejection fraction (EF) in 100 healthy individuals and in patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (AS). All were examined by MRI (1.5 Tesla Siemens Sonate) and the AVA was visualized in segmented 2D flash sequences and planimetry of the performed AVA was manually. The aortic valve area in healthy individuals was 3.9+/-0.7 cm(2), and the LMM was 99+/-27 g. In a correlation analysis, the strongest correlation of AVA was to height (r=0.75, p<0.001) and for LMM to weight (r=0.64, p<0.001). In a multiple regression analysis, the expected AVA for healthy subjects can be predicted using body height: AVA=-2.64+0.04 x(height in cm) -0.47 x w (w=0 for man, w=1 for female).In patients with aortic valve stenosis, AVA was 1.0+/-0.35 cm(2), in correlation to cath lab r=0.72, and LMM was 172+/-56 g. We compared the AS patients results with the data of the healthy subjects, where the reduction of the AVA was 28+/-10% of the expected normal value, while LMM was 42% higher in patients with AS. There was no correlation to height, weight or BSA in patients with AS. With cardiac MRI, planimetry of AVA for normal subjects and patients with AS offered a simple, fast and non-invasive method to quantify AVA. In addition LMM and EF could be determined. The strong correlation between height and AVA documented in normal subjects offered the opportunity to integrate this relation between expected valve area and definitive orifice in determining the disease of the aortic valve for the individual patient. With diagnostic MRI in patients with AS, invasive measurements of the systolic transvalvular gradient does not seem to be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15747039     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-005-0198-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kardiol        ISSN: 0300-5860


  27 in total

1.  Noninvasive Imaging of the Thoracic Aorta.

Authors:  Kerry M. Link
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Aortic stenosis--listen to the patient, look at the valve.

Authors:  C M Otto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement--cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography.

Authors:  Kim Rajappan; Nicholas G Bellenger; Giovanni Melina; Marco Di Terlizzi; Magdi H Yacoub; Desmond J Sheridan; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Transgastric Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the severity of aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  F C Blumberg; M Pfeifer; S R Holmer; E P Kromer; G A Riegger; D Elsner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C H Lorenz; E S Walker; V L Morgan; S S Klein; T P Graham
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  [Risk of invasive diagnosis with retrograde catheterization of the left ventricle in patients with acquired aortic valve stenosis].

Authors:  B Bartsch; K K Haase; W Voelker; W A Schöbel; K R Karsch
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1999-04

7.  Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of native aortic valve area: utility of the double-envelope technique.

Authors:  A D Maslow; J Mashikian; J M Haering; S Heindel; P Douglas; R Levine
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Heyder Omran; Harald Schmidt; Matthias Hackenbroch; Stefan Illien; Peter Bernhardt; Giso von der Recke; Rolf Fimmers; Sebastian Flacke; Günter Layer; Christoph Pohl; Berndt Lüderitz; Hans Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Temporal changes in the causes of aortic stenosis: a surgical pathologic study of 646 cases.

Authors:  C S Passik; D M Ackermann; J R Pluth; W D Edwards
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Gender differences in left ventricle geometry and function in patients undergoing balloon dilatation of the aortic valve for isolated aortic stenosis. NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry.

Authors:  P S Douglas; C M Otto; M C Mickel; A Labovitz; C L Reid; K B Davis
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography.

Authors:  D Haghi; T Suselbeck; S Fluechter; G Kalmar; M Schroder; J J Kaden; T Poerner; M Borggrefe; T Papavassiliu
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Petter Dyverfeldt; Michael D Hope; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01

Review 3.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Angela Morello; Eli V Gelfand
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-09

4.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic valve disease: evaluation of ECG criteria by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Stefan Buchner; Kurt Debl; Josef Haimerl; Behrus Djavidani; Florian Poschenrieder; Stefan Feuerbach; Guenter A J Riegger; Andreas Luchner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.364

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.