Literature DB >> 3807436

Temporal changes in the causes of aortic stenosis: a surgical pathologic study of 646 cases.

C S Passik, D M Ackermann, J R Pluth, W D Edwards.   

Abstract

Among 646 patients with pure aortic stenosis who underwent valve replacement at our institution between 1981 and 1985, the three most frequent causes were calcification of congenitally bicuspid aortic valves (38%), degenerative (senile) calcification of tricuspid aortic valves (33%), and postinflammatory (presumably rheumatic) calcification and fibrosis (24%). Among the 324 patients younger than 70 years of age, calcified bicuspid valves were observed in 50%. In contrast, among 322 patients 70 years of age or older, degenerative calcification accounted for 48% of the stenotic aortic valves. During the 5 years of the study, the relative frequency of postinflammatory disease decreased from 30% to 18%, and that of bicuspid valves decreased from 37% to 33%. In contrast, the relative frequency of degenerative calcification increased from 30% to 46%. Consequently, degenerative (senile) calcification is currently the most common cause of aortic stenosis among patients undergoing valve replacement at our institution. This finding may be related to changes in life expectancy in the general population, alterations in patient referral practices, and an increased willingness of surgeons to operate on older patients. Regardless of cause, the observed temporal changes in etiologic factors for aortic stenosis may indicate a potential source of increasing health-care costs among the elderly population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3807436     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61880-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  24 in total

Review 1.  Worldwide perspective of valve disease.

Authors:  J Soler-Soler; E Galve
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The vitamin D receptor genotype predisposes to the development of calcific aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  J R Ortlepp; R Hoffmann; F Ohme; J Lauscher; F Bleckmann; P Hanrath
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Aortic Stenosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-04

4.  Risk factors for progression of calcific aortic stenosis and potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Ashvin R Kamath; Ramdas G Pai
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Prosthetic valve selection for middle-aged patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Joanna Chikwe; Farzan Filsoufi; Alain F Carpentier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  A case of unicuspid aortic valve associated with a single coronary artery and ventricular septal defect.

Authors:  Hiroko Ishigami; Masatsugu Iwase; Keiko Hyoudo; Idumi Aoyama; Mamoru Ito; Kazuki Tajima; Kazuo Hasegawa; Naoya Tsuboi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Clinical characteristics of elderly patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Masahiko Kato; Kazuhiro Yamamoto
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-09-23

Review 8.  Co-ordinating Notch, BMP, and TGF-β signaling during heart valve development.

Authors:  Victoria C Garside; Alex C Chang; Aly Karsan; Pamela A Hoodless
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Echocardiographic Parameters of Clinically Normal Geriatric Rhesus Macaques (Macacamulatta).

Authors:  Yu Ueda; Catherine T Gunther-Harrington; Christina L Cruzen; Jeffrey A Roberts; Joshua A Stern
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Quantification of aortic valve area and left ventricular muscle mass in healthy subjects and patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis by MRI.

Authors:  J Haimerl; A Freitag-Krikovic; A Rauch; E Sauer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.