Literature DB >> 9672974

Digital mammography.

S A Feig1, M J Yaffe.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9672974     DOI： 10.1148/radiographics.18.4.9672974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN： 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Clinical results of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Which phantom is better for assessing the image quality in full-field digital mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation phantom versus digital mammography accreditation phantom.

Authors:  Sung Eun Song; Bo Kyoung Seo; An Yie; Bon Kyung Ku; Hee-Young Kim; Kyu Ran Cho; Hwan Hoon Chung; Seung Hwa Lee; Kyu-Won Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Laura S Gold; Gregory Klein; Lauren Carr; Larry Kessler; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.909
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.