Literature DB >> 17375277

[Mammography screening].

R Schulz-Wendtland1, N Becker, K Bock, K Anders, W Bautz.   

Abstract

Exclusive biannual mammography screening for women ages 50-69 years reduces the mortality from breast cancer among participants by 35%. Compared with 50% of clinically detected cancers, only 20% of carcinomas detected in screening have nodal metastases, and up to 55% of screening carcinomas are in the T1 stage of "minimal cancer." In many European countries (including Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, and Great Britain), mammography screening programmes have been established for more than 10 years. In Germany, the aim is to establish, by 2008, a nationwide organised programme on the basis of the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance. This goal requires 80-100 mammography screening units. The first screening units went into use in 2005. Women between 50 and 69 years are invited to participate in 2-year intervals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17375277     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-007-1490-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Radiation exposure in x-ray mammography].

Authors:  M Säbel; U Aichinger; R Schulz-Wendtland
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-02

2.  The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up.

Authors:  L Tabár; B Vitak; H H Chen; S W Duffy; M F Yen; C F Chiang; U B Krusemo; T Tot; R A Smith
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  [Screening from the epidemiological viewpoint].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  [The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.

Authors:  Nikolaus Becker; Matti Hakama; Lennarth Nyström
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.

Authors:  Johannes D M Otten; Nico Karssemeijer; Jan H C L Hendriks; Johanna H Groenewoud; Jacques Fracheboud; André L M Verbeek; Harry J de Koning; Roland Holland
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?

Authors:  P C Gøtzsche; O Olsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A novel method for prediction of long-term outcome of women with T1a, T1b, and 10-14 mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective study.

Authors:  L Tabár; H H Chen; S W Duffy; M F Yen; C F Chiang; P B Dean; R A Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-05       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Effectiveness of the public health policy for breast cancer screening in Finland: population based cohort study.

Authors:  M Hakama; E Pukkala; M Heikkilä; M Kallio
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-03-22

Review 10.  The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a review.

Authors:  Bircan Erbas; Elena Provenzano; Jane Armes; Dorota Gertig
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; T Wacker; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Influence of patient age on capsular contracture after aesthetic breast augmentation.

Authors:  Philip H Zeplin; Niamph Corduff
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 3.  [Breast cancer imaging].

Authors:  M Funke; C Villena
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.635

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.