Literature DB >> 28801793

Robotic technique improves entry point alignment for intramedullary nailing of femur fractures compared to the conventional technique: a cadaveric study.

Eduardo M Suero1, Ralf Westphal2, Musa Citak3, Nael Hawi3, Emmanouil Liodakis3, Christian Krettek3, Timo Stuebig3.   

Abstract

We aimed to test whether a robotic technique would offer more accurate access to the proximal femoral medullary cavity for insertion of an intramedullary nail compared to the conventional manual technique. The medullary cavity of ten femur specimens was accessed in a conventional fashion using fluoroscopic control. In ten additional femur specimens, ISO-C 3D scans were obtained and a computer program calculated the ideal location of the cavity opening based on the trajectory of the medullary canal. In both techniques, the surgeon opened the cavity using a drill and inserted a radiopaque tube that matched the diameter of the cavity. The mean difference in angle between the proximal opening and the medullary canal in the shaft of the femur was calculated for both groups. Robotic cavity opening was more accurate than the manual technique, with a mean difference in trajectory between the proximal opening and the shaft canal of 2.0° (95% CI 0.6°-3.5°) compared to a mean difference of 4.3° (95% CI 2.11°-6.48°) using the manual technique (P = 0.0218). The robotic technique was more accurate than the manual procedure for identifying the optimal location for opening the medullary canal for insertion of an intramedullary nail. Additional advantages may include a reduction in total radiation exposure, as only one ISO-C 3D scan is needed, as opposed to multiple radiographs when using the manual technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entry point; Intramedullary nailing; Robotic fracture reduction; Telemanipulated fracture reduction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28801793     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0735-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  21 in total

1.  Soft tissue anatomy around the hip and its implications for choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing.

Authors:  C M Ansari Moein; M H J Verhofstad; R L A W Bleys; Chr van der Werken
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing.

Authors:  George Anastopoulos; Dionisios Chissas; Joseph Dourountakis; Panagiotis G Ntagiopoulos; Evaggelos Magnisalis; Antonios Asimakopoulos; Theodore A Xenakis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Three-dimensional correlation between trochanteric fossa and the ideal entry point for antegrade femoral nailing.

Authors:  Young-Soo Byun; Gu-Hee Jung
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Unreamed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: operative technique and early clinical experience with the standard locking option.

Authors:  C Krettek; J Rudolf; P Schandelmaier; P Guy; B Könemann; H Tscherne
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Femoral bone strains during antegrade nailing: a comparison of two entry points with identical nails using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Todd M Tupis; Gregory T Altman; Daniel T Altman; Harold A Cook; Mark Carl Miller
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  William M Ricci; John Schwappach; Michael Tucker; Kevin Coupe; Angel Brandt; Roy Sanders; Ross Leighton
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing.

Authors:  Robert F Ostrum; Andrew Marcantonio; Robert Marburger
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Robotized access to the medullary cavity for intramedullary nailing of the femur.

Authors:  Markus Oszwald; Ralf Westphal; Daniel Klepzig; Afshin Khalafi; Ralph Gaulke; Christian W Müller; Friedrich Wahl; Christian Krettek; Thomas Gösling
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.285

9.  Lateral insertion points in antegrade femoral nailing and their influence on femoral bone strains.

Authors:  Berend Linke; Chloe Ansari Moein; Oliver Bösl; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Chris van der Werken; Karsten Schwieger; Keito Ito
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts.

Authors:  William M Ricci; Bethany Gallagher; George J Haidukewych
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Development and clinical application of robot-assisted technology in traumatic orthopedics].

Authors:  Zhenzhong Zhu; Guoyan Zheng; Changqing Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-08-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.