| Literature DB >> 28801793 |
Eduardo M Suero1, Ralf Westphal2, Musa Citak3, Nael Hawi3, Emmanouil Liodakis3, Christian Krettek3, Timo Stuebig3.
Abstract
We aimed to test whether a robotic technique would offer more accurate access to the proximal femoral medullary cavity for insertion of an intramedullary nail compared to the conventional manual technique. The medullary cavity of ten femur specimens was accessed in a conventional fashion using fluoroscopic control. In ten additional femur specimens, ISO-C 3D scans were obtained and a computer program calculated the ideal location of the cavity opening based on the trajectory of the medullary canal. In both techniques, the surgeon opened the cavity using a drill and inserted a radiopaque tube that matched the diameter of the cavity. The mean difference in angle between the proximal opening and the medullary canal in the shaft of the femur was calculated for both groups. Robotic cavity opening was more accurate than the manual technique, with a mean difference in trajectory between the proximal opening and the shaft canal of 2.0° (95% CI 0.6°-3.5°) compared to a mean difference of 4.3° (95% CI 2.11°-6.48°) using the manual technique (P = 0.0218). The robotic technique was more accurate than the manual procedure for identifying the optimal location for opening the medullary canal for insertion of an intramedullary nail. Additional advantages may include a reduction in total radiation exposure, as only one ISO-C 3D scan is needed, as opposed to multiple radiographs when using the manual technique.Entities:
Keywords: Entry point; Intramedullary nailing; Robotic fracture reduction; Telemanipulated fracture reduction
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28801793 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0735-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Robot Surg ISSN: 1863-2483