Literature DB >> 15741618

Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A five-year minimum follow-up study.

Jeong Joon Yoo1, Young-Min Kim, Kang Sup Yoon, Kyung-Hoi Koo, Won Seok Song, Hee Joong Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ceramic-on-ceramic couplings are attractive alternative bearing surfaces that have been reported to eliminate or reduce problems related to polyethylene wear debris. Disappointing experiences with alumina ceramic bearings in the past have led to many improvements in the manufacture and design of ceramic implants. The purpose of the present study was to report the results of contemporary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties with regard to wear, osteolysis, and fracture of the ceramic after a minimum duration of follow-up of five years.
METHODS: We evaluated the results of a consecutive series of 100 primary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties that had been performed with use of a metal-backed socket and a cementless stem in eighty-four patients. All of the patients were sixty-five years of age or younger (mean age, forty-one years), and a single surgeon performed all of the procedures. After a minimum duration of follow-up of sixty months, one patient (one hip) had died and four patients (six hips) had been lost to follow-up, leaving a total of seventy-nine patients (ninety-three hips) available for study. All of these patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically with special attention to wear, periprosthetic osteolysis, and ceramic failure.
RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score was 97 points at the time of the latest follow-up evaluation. All prostheses demonstrated radiographic evidence of bone ingrowth. No implant was loose radiographically, and no implant was revised. Ceramic wear was not detectable in the thirty-seven hips in which the femoral head could be differentiated from the cup on radiographs. Periprosthetic osteolysis was not observed in any hip. A fracture of the alumina femoral head and a peripheral chip fracture of the alumina insert occurred in one hip following a motor-vehicle accident.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of contemporary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty with a metal-backed socket and a cementless stem were encouraging after a minimum duration of follow-up of five years. We believe that these improved alumina-on-alumina bearing implants offer a promising option for younger, active patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15741618     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.01753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  38 in total

Review 1.  Survival of hard-on-hard bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Siraj A Sayeed; Aaron J Johnson; Thomas P Schmalzried; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Do "premium" joint implants add value?: analysis of high cost joint implants in a community registry.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Amit Sharma; Penny Tatman; Susan Mehle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Fractures of a sandwich ceramic liner at ten year follow-up.

Authors:  Anthony Viste; Julien Chouteau; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The 2009 Frank Stinchfield Award: "Hip squeaking": a biomechanical study of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces.

Authors:  Christophe Chevillotte; Robert T Trousdale; Qingshan Chen; Olivier Guyen; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Delta ceramic-on-alumina ceramic articulation in primary THA: prospective, randomized FDA-IDE study and retrieval analysis.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Brian E Seng; Ian C Clarke; Joanne B Adams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Alumina-on-alumina THA performed in patients younger than 30 years: a 10-year minimum followup study.

Authors:  Hyeong Jo Yoon; Jeong Joon Yoo; Kang Sup Yoon; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Hee Joong Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: minimum of six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Won-Sik Choy; Kap Jung Kim; Sang Ki Lee; Kyoung Wan Bae; Yoon Sub Hwang; Chang Kyu Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-08-20

8.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients younger than 45 years with femoral-head osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Yoowang Choi; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Alumina inlay failure in cemented polyethylene-backed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kentaro Iwakiri; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Yukihide Minoda; Hirotsugu Ohashi; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial.

Authors:  William G Hamilton; James P McAuley; Douglas A Dennis; Jeffrey A Murphy; Thomas J Blumenfeld; Joel Politi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.