Literature DB >> 15736743

A computer touch-screen version of the North American Spine Society outcome assessment instrument for the lumbar spine.

S Schaeren1, H A Bischoff-Ferrari, M Knupp, W Dick, J F Huber, R Theiler.   

Abstract

We validated the North American Spine Society (NASS) outcome-assessment instrument for the lumbar spine in a computerised touch-screen format and assessed patients' acceptance, taking into account previous computer experience, age and gender. Fifty consecutive patients with symptomatic and radiologically-proven degenerative disease of the lumbar spine completed both the hard copy (paper) and the computerised versions of the NASS questionnaire. Statistical analysis showed high agreement between the paper and the touch-screen computer format for both subscales (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.94, 95% confidence interval (0.90 to 0.97)) independent of computer experience, age and gender. In total, 55% of patients stated that the computer format was easier to use and 66% preferred it to the paper version (p < 0.0001 among subjects expressing a preference). Our data indicate that the touch-screen format is comparable to the paper form. It may improve follow-up in clinical practice and research by meeting patients' preferences and minimising administrative work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15736743     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b2.15548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Postoperative physiotherapy in acute care--when, what and how much?].

Authors:  R Theiler; C Schmid; R Risler; L Moser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango.

Authors:  T Zweig; A F Mannion; D Grob; M Melloh; E Munting; A Tuschel; M Aebi; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Technology and quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Eileen Danaher Hacker
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 5.  Outcome assessment: recommendations for daily practice.

Authors:  Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Outcome scores collected by touchscreen: medical audit as it should be in the 21st century?

Authors:  Sean Dixon; Timothy Bunker; Daniel Chan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  [Standardized telephone interviews to monitor pain. Pilot study to determine feasibility].

Authors:  R Theiler; C Widler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Minimum ten-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Arne Mehrkens; Stefan Schären; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

9.  The effectiveness of ergonomic interventions in material handling operations.

Authors:  Steven J Wurzelbacher; Michael P Lampl; Stephen J Bertke; Chih-Yu Tseng
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.661

10.  Validity of a simple Internet-based outcome-prediction tool in patients with total hip replacement: a pilot study.

Authors:  Cornel Stöckli; Robert Theiler; Eduard Sidelnikov; Maria Balsiger; Stephen M Ferrari; Beatus Buchzig; Kurt Uehlinger; Christoph Riniker; Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 6.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.