Literature DB >> 17885770

[Standardized telephone interviews to monitor pain. Pilot study to determine feasibility].

R Theiler1, C Widler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic pain diaries are of increasing interest to patients and physicians. The goal of the present pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of standardized telephone interviews in patients with refractory pain who had been switched to oxycodone in the setting of daily practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Once a week for 3 consecutive weeks, 33 female and male patients answered a standardized telephone interview derived from the ICF (International Classification of Functioning) about the impact of pain on their daily activities.
RESULTS: After 3 weeks, complete datasets were available for 70% of all participants. With flawless technicalities, the following aspects appeared to be worth improving: non-uniform response categories, limited language choice, and handling instructions to physicians and patients. The efficacy (pain relief and improved limitations in the activities of daily living) and good tolerability of oxycodone were comparable with findings reported in clinical trials. More than 95% of patients accepted the anonymous storage of their data for quality control purposes.
CONCLUSION: Standardized telephone interviews aimed at documenting the evolution of pain are feasible in a daily practice setting. They should however be simplified for user-friendliness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17885770     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-007-0580-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  22 in total

1.  [Psychosocial factors in chronic back pain].

Authors:  R Wörz
Journal:  MMW Fortschr Med       Date:  2002-11-28

2.  An electronic diary assessment of the effects of distraction and attentional focusing on pain intensity in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey Roelofs; Madelon L Peters; Jacob Patijn; Erik G W Schouten; Johan W S Vlaeyen
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2006-11

3.  Treatment of persistent pain associated with osteoarthritis with controlled-release oxycodone tablets in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Joseph A Markenson; Joseph Croft; P G Zhang; Patricia Richards
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Associations among pain intensity, sensory characteristics, affective qualities, and activity limitations in patients with chronic pain: a momentary, within-person perspective.

Authors:  Leighann Litcher-Kelly; Arthur A Stone; Joan E Broderick; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 5.  Psychological approaches to understanding and treating disease-related pain.

Authors:  Francis J Keefe; Amy P Abernethy; Lisa C Campbell
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Electronic pain diary: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Jan Gaertner; Frank Elsner; Klaus Pollmann-Dahmen; Lukas Radbruch; Rainer Sabatowski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Incorporating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) into an electronic health record to create indicators of function: proof of concept using the SF-12.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Lise Poissant; Sara Ahmed; Lois Finch; Johanne Higgins; Nancy M Salbach; Judith Soicher; Susan Jaglal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Joan E Broderick; Joseph E Schwartz; Saul Shiffman; Leighann Litcher-Kelly; Pamela Calvanese
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  A method for achieving consensus on rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures: the OMERACT conference process.

Authors:  B J Fried; M Boers; P R Baker
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.