Literature DB >> 15735303

An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system.

L T Kozlowski1, N A Dreschel, S D Stellman, J Wilkenfeld, E B Weiss, M E Goldberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Barclay cigarette (Brown & Williamson) was introduced in 1980 in the USA in the most expensive launch in history. In the USA and around the world, Barclay was later determined to have a grooved filter design that was compromised by human smokers in the normal act of smoking, but that was measured as ultra-low tar using the standard tar testing protocol.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether Brown & Williamson knew of the compensatability of Barclay during the design process and before it was released; to evaluate initial responses of competing tobacco companies to Barclay, before complaints were made to the Federal Trade Commission in 1981.
METHODS: Internet databases of industry documents (Tobacco Documents Online, Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, Brown & Williamson Litigation discovery website, Guildford and major company websites) were searched using key words, key dates, and targeted searches. Documents related specifically to the development, evaluation and release of the Barclay cigarette and related to the responses by competing tobacco companies were examined.
RESULTS: Documents indicate the manufacturer was aware of Barclay design problems and was planning, before release, to respond to criticism. Competing companies quickly detected the filter groove stratagem and considered developing their own similar filter, but eventually backed off.
CONCLUSION: The design problems with Barclay were readily understood by cigarette manufacturers, including the maker of Barclay, before official governmental evaluations occurred. Testing involving measured exposures to human smokers may in the end be crucial to identifying problems with novel cigarette designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15735303      PMCID: PMC1747993          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.009167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  9 in total

1.  Official cigarette tar tests are misleading: use a two-stage, compensating test.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  More on the regulation of tobacco smoke: how we got here and where next.

Authors:  N Gray; L T Kozlowski
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Unlocking the corporate documents of British American Tobacco: an invaluable global resource needs radically improved access.

Authors:  Jeff Collin; Kelley Lee; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-29       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Have tar and nicotine yields of cigarettes changed?

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; W S Rickert; J C Robinson; N E Grunberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products.

Authors:  S A Bialous; D Yach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Tobacco related bar promotions: insights from tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  S K Katz; A M Lavack
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Big tobacco is watching: British American Tobacco's surveillance and information concealment at the Guildford depository.

Authors:  Monique E Muggli; Eric M LeGresley; Richard D Hurt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-05-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Smokers of low-yield cigarettes do not consume less nicotine.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; S M Hall; R I Herning; P Jacob; R T Jones; A L Osman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Cessation among smokers of "light" cigarettes: results from the 2000 national health interview survey.

Authors:  Hilary A Tindle; Nancy A Rigotti; Roger B Davis; Elizabeth M Barbeau; Ichiro Kawachi; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Ron Borland; Michael K Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 3.  Tobacco packaging and labeling policies under the U.S. Tobacco Control Act: research needs and priorities.

Authors:  David Hammond
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Changes in tar yields and cigarette design in samples of Chinese cigarettes, 2009 and 2012.

Authors:  Liane M Schneller; Benjamin A Zwierzchowski; Rosalie V Caruso; Qiang Li; Jiang Yuan; Geoffrey T Fong; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Switching to "lighter" cigarettes and quitting smoking.

Authors:  H A Tindle; S Shiffman; A M Hartman; J E Bost
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Transnational tobacco company interests in smokeless tobacco in Europe: analysis of internal industry documents and contemporary industry materials.

Authors:  Silvy Peeters; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Filter presence and tipping paper color influence consumer perceptions of cigarettes.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; K Michael Cummings; David Hammond; James F Thrasher; Cindy Tworek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Tobacco industry issues management organizations: creating a global corporate network to undermine public health.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Gina Intinarelli; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 4.185

10.  Light and mild redux: heated tobacco products' reduced exposure claims are likely to be misunderstood as reduced risk claims.

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Lauren Kass Lempert; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 7.552

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.