Literature DB >> 11387528

Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products.

S A Bialous1, D Yach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the extent of the tobacco industry involvement in establishing international standards for tobacco and tobacco products and the industry influence on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
METHODS: Analysis of tobacco industry documents made public as part of the settlement of the Minnesota Tobacco Trial and the Master Settlement Agreement. Search words included "ISO", "CORESTA", "Barclay", "compensation and machine smoking", "tar and nicotine deliveries", and the name of key players, in different combinations.
RESULTS: It is clear that the tobacco industry, through the Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA), play a major role in determining the scientific evidence and suggesting the standards that are eventually adopted as international standards for tobacco and tobacco products in several areas, including the measurement of cigarette tar and nicotine yield.
CONCLUSIONS: ISO's tobacco and tobacco products standards are not adequate to guide tobacco products regulatory policies, and no health claims can be made based on ISO's tobacco products standards. There is an urgent need for tobacco control advocates and groups worldwide to be more involved with the work of the ISO, both directly and through their national standardisation organisations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11387528      PMCID: PMC1747547          DOI: 10.1136/tc.10.2.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  9 in total

1.  The future of tobacco product regulation and labelling in Europe: implications for the forthcoming European Union directive.

Authors:  C Bates; A McNeill; M Jarvis; N Gray
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Globalisation of tobacco industry influence and new global responses.

Authors:  D Yach; D Bettcher
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  The low tar lie.

Authors:  N R Leavell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Official cigarette tar tests are misleading: use a two-stage, compensating test.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; M E Goldberg; B A Yost; E L White; C T Sweeney; J L Pillitteri
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Reported cigarette smoke values: a closer look.

Authors:  D Hoffmann; J D Adams; N J Haley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Comparison of measured and FTC-predicted nicotine uptake in smokers.

Authors:  G D Byrd; J H Robinson; W S Caldwell; J D deBethizy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  A further study of FTC yield and nicotine absorption in smokers.

Authors:  G D Byrd; R A Davis; W S Caldwell; J H Robinson; J D deBethizy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Prying open the door to the tobacco industry's secrets about nicotine: the Minnesota Tobacco Trial.

Authors:  R D Hurt; C R Robertson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  ASHRAE Standard 62: tobacco industry's influence over national ventilation standards.

Authors:  S Aguinaga Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Tobacco industry manipulation of research.

Authors:  Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The most important and influential papers in tobacco control: results of an online poll.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Perceived harms and benefits of tobacco, marijuana, and electronic vaporizers among young adults in Colorado: implications for health education and research.

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Emily Anne McDonald; Sohrab Sidhu; Rachel Barry; Tracey A Richers Maruyama; Nicolas M Sheon; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin: destroying tobacco control activism from the inside.

Authors:  Stacy M Carter
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Cigarette Filter Ventilation and its Relationship to Increasing Rates of Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Ae Song; Neal L Benowitz; Micah Berman; Theodore M Brasky; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Catalin Marian; Richard O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Casper Woroszylo; Peter G Shields
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; N A Dreschel; S D Stellman; J Wilkenfeld; E B Weiss; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Distinguishing Petroleum (Crude Oil and Fuel) From Smoke Exposure within Populations Based on the Relative Blood Levels of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes (BTEX), Styrene and 2,5-Dimethylfuran by Pattern Recognition Using Artificial Neural Networks.

Authors:  D M Chambers; C M Reese; L G Thornburg; E Sanchez; J P Rafson; B C Blount; J R E Ruhl; V R De Jesús
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Reconciling human smoking behavior and machine smoking patterns: implications for understanding smoking behavior and the impact on laboratory studies.

Authors:  Catalin Marian; Richard J O'Connor; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Vaughan W Rees; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Tobacco industry strategies to undermine the 8th World Conference on Tobacco or Health.

Authors:  M E Muggli; R D Hurt
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.