Literature DB >> 15734377

A 10-year experience with the Carbomedics cardiac prosthesis.

Ryuji Tominaga1, Kazuhiro Kurisu, Yoshie Ochiai, Yukihiro Tomita, Munetaka Masuda, Shigeki Morita, Hisataka Yasui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are few reports on the long-term results of Carbomedics prosthetic heart valves.
METHODS: Five hundred five patients who underwent valve replacement with this prosthesis in the aortic or mitral position were chosen for this study. Patients' mean age was 57 years. There were 173 aortic (AVR), 253 mitral (MVR), and 79 double (DVR) valve implants. The mean follow-up was 5.1 years, and cumulative follow-up was 2,590 patient-years with an overall follow-up rate of 99.2%.
RESULTS: The early mortality rate for the total population was 2.8% (AVR 1.2%, MVR 3.6%, DVR 3.8%). Actuarial freedom from thromboembolism at 10 years was 81.8% +/- 5.1%, 85.7% +/- 3.2%, and 88.8% +/- 6.8% for AVR, MVR, and DVR, respectively. At 10 years, 92.7% of AVR, 85.4% of MVR, and 94.7% of DVR patients were free of valve-related death. Overall survival rate at 10 years was 77.6% +/- 4.6%, 71.8% +/- 4.2%, and 81.3% +/- 5.8% for AVR, MVR, and DVR, respectively. The linearized rate of thromboembolism was 1.45%/patient-year, 1.78%/patient-year, 0.67%/patient-year; of major bleeding events, 0.52%/patient-year, 0.85%/patient-year, 0.45%/patient-year; of valve thrombosis, 0%/patient-year, 0.25%/patient-year, 0%/patient-year; of prosthetic valve endocarditis, 0.1%/patient-year, 0.25%/patient-year, 0.22%/patient-year; and of all reoperations, 0.31%/patient-year, 0.93%/patient-year, 1.1%/patient-year for AVR, MVR, and DVR, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The Carbomedics prosthetic heart valves showed comparable or even better results than those of other mechanical valves with respect to morbidity and mortality. These results may justify the use of Carbomedics valves as one of the mechanical heart valves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15734377     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.08.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  13 in total

1.  Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  James D Douketis; Alex C Spyropoulos; Frederick A Spencer; Michael Mayr; Amir K Jaffer; Mark H Eckman; Andrew S Dunn; Regina Kunz
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Clinical experience with the Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis.

Authors:  Yoshio Misawa; Tsutomu Saito; Hiroaki Konishi; Shin-Ichi Oki; Yuichiro Kaminishi; Yasuhito Sakano; Hideki Morita; Kei Aizawa
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: comparison of long-term results.

Authors:  Ozer Kandemir; Hilmi Tokmakoglu; Ulku Yildiz; Tevfik Tezcaner; A Cem Yorgancioglu; Lihan Gunay; Kaya Suzer; Yaman Zorlutuna
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

4.  Complete dehiscence and unseated prosthetic aortic valve causing severe aortic insufficiency: an unusual complication of prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  Rama K Krishna; Paola Casanova; Maiteder Larrauri-Reyes; Orlando Santana
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-10-24

5.  Twelve years of experience with the ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses.

Authors:  Shinichiro Taniguchi; Koji Hashizume; Tsuneo Ariyoshi; Yoichi Hisata; Kazuyoshi Tanigawa; Takashi Miura; Tomohiro Odate; Seiji Matsukuma; Shun Nakaji; Kiyoyuki Eishi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-07-06

Review 6.  Artificial valves "up to date" in Japan.

Authors:  Shigehiko Tokunaga; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 7.  Current status of the mechanical valve and bioprosthesis in Japan.

Authors:  Shigehiko Tokunaga; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-07-06       Impact factor: 1.731

8.  Left ventricular performance after aortic valve replacement in patients with low ejection fraction.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Tanoue; Yasuhisa Oishi; Hiromichi Sonoda; Takahiro Nishida; Atsuhiro Nakashima; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 9.  Heart valve replacement: which valve for which patient?

Authors:  Joseph Huh; Faisal Bakaeen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Relationship between the Occurrence of Thromboembolism and INR Measurement Interval in Low Intensity Anticoagulation after Aortic Mechanical Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Sangho Rhie; Jun Young Choi; In Seok Jang; Jong Woo Kim; Chung Eun Lee; Hyun Oh Park
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.