Literature DB >> 15725201

Syrian women's preferences for birth attendant and birth place.

Hyam Bashour1, Asmaa Abdulsalam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women's preferences for type of maternity caregiver and birth place have gained importance and have been documented in studies reported from the developed world. The purpose of our study was to identify Syrian women's preferences for birth attendant and place of delivery.
METHODS: Interviews with 500 women living in Damascus and its suburbs were conducted using a pretested structured questionnaire. Women were asked about their preferences for the birth attendant and place of delivery, and an open-ended question asked them to give an explanation for their preferences. We analyzed preferences and their determinants, and also agreement between actual and preferred place of delivery and birth attendant.
RESULTS: Only a small minority of women (5-10%) had no preference. Most (65.8%) preferred to give birth at the hospital, and 60.4 percent preferred to be attended by doctors compared with midwives (21.2%). More than 85 percent of women preferred the obstetrician to be a female. The actual place of delivery and type of birth attendant did not match the preferred place of delivery and type of birth attendant. Women's reasons for preferences were a perception of safety and competence, and communication style of caregiver.
CONCLUSIONS: Most women preferred to be delivered by female doctors at a hospital in this population sample in Syria. The findings suggest that proper understanding of women's preferences is needed, and steps should be taken to enable women to make good choices. Policies about maternity education and services should take into account women's preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725201      PMCID: PMC1457105          DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00333.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  14 in total

1.  Women prefer hospital births.

Authors:  M Johnson; J Smith; S Haddad; J Walker; A Wong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-25

2.  Maternity care in The Netherlands: the changing home birth rate.

Authors:  T A Wiegers; J van der Zee; M J Keirse
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care.

Authors:  V Hundley; M Ryan; W Graham
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Women's experiences of maternity care: satisfaction or passivity?

Authors:  T Kabakian-Khasholian; O Campbell; M Shediac-Rizkallah; F Ghorayeb
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Effects of obstetrician gender on communication and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  D L Roter; G Geller; B A Bernhardt; S M Larson; T Doksum
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Swedish women's interest in home birth and in-hospital birth center care.

Authors:  Ingegerd Hildingsson; Ulla Waldenström; Ingela Rådestad
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  Determinants of women's choice of obstetrician/gynecologist.

Authors:  Michael Zuckerman; Navid Navizedeh; Joseph Feldman; Sandra McCalla; Howard Minkoff
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2002-03

8.  Factors related to the preference for a female gynecologist.

Authors:  E Haar; V Halitsky; G Stricker
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Do women prefer female obstetricians?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Birdette Gardiner; John Concato
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Women's preferences for sex of doctor: a postal survey.

Authors:  S Nichols
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Working time directive in an all female specialty.

Authors:  Vaidyanathan Gowri
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2009-07

2.  The limitations on choice: Palestinian women's childbirth location, dissatisfaction with the place of birth and determinants.

Authors:  Rita Giacaman; Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh; Laura Wick
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Maternal Health Care Utilization Among Syrian Refugees in Lebanon and Jordan.

Authors:  Hannah Tappis; Emily Lyles; Ann Burton; Shannon Doocy
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

4.  Syrian women's perceptions and experiences of ultrasound screening in pregnancy: implications for antenatal policy.

Authors:  Hyam Bashour; Raghda Hafez; Asmaa Abdulsalam
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2005-05

5.  Knowledge and reported practices of men and women on maternal and child health in rural Guinea Bissau: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Rebecca King; Vera Mann; Peter D Boone
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  U.S. Nulliparas' Reasons for Expected Provider Type and Childbirth Setting.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

7.  Hospital-based caesarean section in the Arab region: an overview.

Authors:  M Khawaja; N Choueiry; R Jurdi
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.628

8.  Pregnant women's preference and factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization in Debra Markos Town, North West Ethiopia: a community based follow up study.

Authors:  Hinsermu Bayu; Mulatu Adefris; Abdella Amano; Mulunesh Abuhay
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Assessment on the knowledge and reported practices of women on maternal and child health in rural Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Joseph Sam Kanu; Yuan Tang; Yawen Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cesarean sections among Syrian refugees in Lebanon from december 2012/january 2013 to june 2013: probable causes and recommendations.

Authors:  Karin M J Huster; Njogu Patterson; Marian Schilperoord; Paul Spiegel
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2014-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.