Literature DB >> 12581035

Swedish women's interest in home birth and in-hospital birth center care.

Ingegerd Hildingsson1, Ulla Waldenström, Ingela Rådestad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, few alternatives to a hospital birth are available, and little is known about consumer interest in alternative birth care. The aim of this study was to determine women's interest in home birth and in-hospital birth center care in Sweden, and to describe the characteristics of these women.
METHODS: All Swedish-speaking women booked for antenatal care during 3 weeks during 1 year were invited to participate in the study. Three questionnaires, completed after the first booking visit in early pregnancy, at 2 months, and 1 year after the birth, asked about the women's interest in two alternative birth options and a wide range of possible explanatory variables.
RESULTS: Consent to participate in the study was given by 3283 women (71% of all women eligible). The rates of response to the three questionnaires were 94, 88, and 88 percent, respectively. One percent of participants consistently expressed an interest in home birth on all three occasions, and 8 percent expressed an interest in birth center care. A regression analysis showed five factors that were associated with an interest in home birth: a wish to have the baby's siblings (OR 20.2; 95% CI 6.2-66.5) and a female friend (OR 15.2; 95% CI 6.2-37.4) present at the birth, not wanting pharmacological pain relief during labor and birth (OR 4.7; 95% CI 1.4-15.3), low level of education (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.8-11.4), and dissatisfaction with medical aspects of intrapartum care (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.4-9.2). An interest in birth center care was associated with experience of being in control during labor and birth (OR 8.3; 95% CI 3.2-21.6), not wanting pharmacological pain relief (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.1), and a preference to have a known midwife at the birth (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.6-2.9).
CONCLUSION: If Swedish women were offered free choice of place of birth, the home birth rate would be 10 times higher, and the 20 largest hospitals would need to have a birth center. Women interested in alternative models of care view childbirth as a social and natural event, and their needs should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12581035     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00212.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  11 in total

1.  Assessing Preferences Regarding Healthcare Interventions that Involve Non-Health Outcomes: An Overview of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Brent C Opmeer; Corianne A J M de Borgie; Ben W J Mol; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  In search of a common agenda for planned home birth in america.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

3.  Syrian women's preferences for birth attendant and birth place.

Authors:  Hyam Bashour; Asmaa Abdulsalam
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Determinants of Place of Delivery during the COVID-19 Pandemic-Internet Survey in Polish Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Mateusz Strózik; Lukasz Szarpak; Ishag Adam; Jacek Smereka
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.948

5.  U.S. Nulliparas' Reasons for Expected Provider Type and Childbirth Setting.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

6.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study.

Authors:  Celia Grigg; Sally K Tracy; Rea Daellenbach; Mary Kensington; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Preferences for birth center care in the Netherlands: an exploration of ethnic differences.

Authors:  Dominique Lescure; Sanneke Schepman; Ronald Batenburg; Therese A Wiegers; Ellen Verbakel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28

10.  Why do women prefer home births in Ethiopia?

Authors:  Solomon Shiferaw; Mark Spigt; Merijn Godefrooij; Yilma Melkamu; Michael Tekie
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.