Literature DB >> 11903214

Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care.

V Hundley1, M Ryan, W Graham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent government reports have recommended involving consumers in the planning of health services. Although satisfaction surveys have traditionally been used, they have several limitations. This paper describes a relatively new method of eliciting consumer preferences that allows respondents (women) to indicate the importance that they attribute to specific aspects of a service. The aim was to explore the feasibility of using a discrete choice experiment to assess the importance to women of different aspects of intrapartum care.
METHODS: In this pilot study of 301 women at low obstetric risk, data were collected using an anonymous self-complete questionnaire given to each participant by the midwife at the booking visit.
RESULTS: The results of the regression model suggest that respondents prefer maternity units that offer greater continuity of caregiver, more methods of pain relief, continuous fetal heart rate monitoring, a homely appearance, routine involvement of medical staff, and greater involvement for the woman in the decision-making process. Although all attributes were important to women, they were not all of equal importance. For example, if continuity of caregiver were achieved at the expense of decreasing the availability of pain relief then women would be worse off.
CONCLUSIONS: The discrete choice experiment appears to be a useful tool in assessing the strength of women's preferences for different aspects of maternity care. Future research should include a qualitative approach to explore in greater depth the processes involved in shaping women's preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11903214     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00254.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  16 in total

1.  Syrian women's preferences for birth attendant and birth place.

Authors:  Hyam Bashour; Asmaa Abdulsalam
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 2.  How should costs and cost-effectiveness be considered in prenatal genetic testing?

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Eliciting individual preferences for health care: a case study of perinatal care.

Authors:  Marjon van der Pol; Alan Shiell; Flora Au; David Jonhston; Suzanne Tough
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Women's Preferences for Birthing Hospital in Denmark: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Nasrin Tayyari Dehbarez; Morten Raun Mørkbak; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Niels Uldbjerg; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Delivering information: a descriptive study of Australian women's information needs for decision-making about birth facility.

Authors:  Rachel Thompson; Aleena M Wojcieszek
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Is the Nintendo Wii Fit really acceptable to older people? A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kate Laver; Julie Ratcliffe; Stacey George; Leonie Burgess; Maria Crotty
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Birth control: to what extent do women report being informed and involved in decisions about pregnancy and birth procedures?

Authors:  Rachel Thompson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Depressive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder as determinants of preference weights for attributes of obstetric care among Ethiopian women.

Authors:  Magdalena M Paczkowski; Margaret E Kruk; Fasil Tessema; Ayalew Tegegn; Sandro Galea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Protocol for the immediate delivery versus expectant care of women with preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT) Trial [ISRCTN44485060].

Authors:  Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts; Caroline A Crowther; Sarah L Buchanan; David J Henderson-Smart; Glenn Salkeld
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kirsten Howard; Karen Gerard; Pamela Adelson; Robert Bryce; Chris Wilkinson; Deborah Turnbull
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.