Literature DB >> 10912958

Effects of obstetrician gender on communication and patient satisfaction.

D L Roter1, G Geller, B A Bernhardt, S M Larson, T Doksum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe patient-obstetrician communication during the first prenatal visit and its relationship to physician gender and patient satisfaction.
METHODS: The first prenatal visit of 87 women with 21 obstetricians (11 male and ten female) was audiotaped and analyzed using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Patient satisfaction was measured by postvisit questionnaire.
RESULTS: Communication during first prenatal visits was largely biomedical, with little psychosocial or social discussion. Male physicians conducted longer visits than females (26 minutes versus 21.9 minutes, P < .05) and engaged in more facilitative communication (ie, making sure they were understood and providing direction and orientation) and explicit statements of concern and partnership (z > 1.96, P < .05). Female physicians devoted more communication to agreements, disagreements, and laughter than males (z > 1.96, P < .05). Satisfaction with physicians' emotional responsiveness and informational partnership was related to female physician gender and a variety of task-focused and affective communication variables.
CONCLUSION: Communication and satisfaction between women and obstetricians during initial prenatal visits is related to physician gender and patient satisfaction. Male physicians conducted longer visits but women were more satisfied with female physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10912958     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00542-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  20 in total

1.  Interpersonal expectations in the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  M C Beach; D L Roter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Disparities in health and health care: moving from describing the problem to a call for action.

Authors:  C M Mangione; E Reynolds
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Syrian women's preferences for birth attendant and birth place.

Authors:  Hyam Bashour; Asmaa Abdulsalam
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Adaptation of a communication interaction behavior instrument for use in mechanically ventilated, nonvocal older adults.

Authors:  Marci Lee Nilsen; Mary Beth Happ; Heidi Donovan; Amber Barnato; Leslie Hoffman; Susan M Sereika
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Does physician gender affect satisfaction of men and women visiting the emergency department?

Authors:  K P Derose; R D Hays; D F McCaffrey; D W Baker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  How do obstetric providers discuss referrals for prenatal genetic counseling?

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Carrie Mastromarino Haunstetter; Debra Roter; Gail Geller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Differences in individual approaches: communication in the familial breast cancer consultation and the effect on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lobb; Phyllis Butow; Alexandra Barratt; Bettina Meiser; Katherine Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Communication and cultural issues in providing reproductive health care to immigrant women: health care providers' experiences in meeting the needs of [corrected] Somali women living in Finland.

Authors:  Filio Degni; Sakari Suominen; Birgitta Essén; Walid El Ansari; Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-04

10.  Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients' and physicians' views.

Authors:  Linda C Zandbelt; Ellen M A Smets; Frans J Oort; Mieke H Godfried; Hanneke C J M de Haes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.