Literature DB >> 15721716

Refractive Surgery Survey 2004.

Helga P Sandoval1, Luis E Fernández de Castro, David T Vroman, Kerry D Solomon.   

Abstract

To determine the refractive surgery (RS) preferences of ophthalmologists worldwide, questionnaires were sent to 8897 members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. A total of 1053 questionnaires were returned by the deadline. The practice distribution included 29.5% cataract surgeons, 48.8% comprehensive ophthalmologists, 11.6% RS specialists, 5.1% cornea and external disease specialists, 1.9% glaucoma specialists, 1.1% retina specialists, and <1.0% oculoplastics/pediatrics/researchers/retired. Results were compared with those in the 2003 survey and demonstrate that refractive surgery continues to develop and change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15721716     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  18 in total

1.  Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy mode using SCHWIND-ESIRIS excimer laser: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Dong-Mei Wang; Yi Du; Guang-Sheng Chen; Liu-Song Tang; Jian-Feng He
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Q-value customized ablation (custom-Q) versus wavefront optimized ablation for primary myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Ahmed Tawfik; Ahmed Mostafa Eid; Rabei Hasanen; Ismail A N Moftah
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Visual performance after conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration: results at 1 year.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Rui Li; Lei Tian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Comparison of visual and refractive results after transepithelial and mechanical photorefractive keratectomy in myopia.

Authors:  Yusuf Yildirim; Onur Olcucu; Nese Alagoz; Alper Agca; Yalcin Karakucuk; Ahmet Demirok
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Subjective pain, visual recovery and visual quality after LASIK, EpiLASIK (flap off) and APRK - a consecutive, non-randomized study.

Authors:  Christos Skevas; Toam Katz; Lars Wagenfeld; Gisbert Richard; Stephan Linke
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comparison of corneal flaps created by Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Yue-Hua Zhou; Jing Zhang; Yan Zheng; Chang-Bin Zhai; Jing Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Cataract and refractive surgery in ; a survey of KSCRS members from 1995~2006.

Authors:  Sang Chul Yoon; Jee Woong Jung; Hee Jin Sohn; Kyung Hwan Shyn
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-08

8.  Interfaces detection after corneal refractive surgery by low coherence optical interferometry.

Authors:  I Verrier; C Veillas; T Lépine; F Nguyen; G Thuret; P Gain
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  One-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): mild to moderate myopia vs. high myopia.

Authors:  Jae Ryun Kim; Bu Ki Kim; Su Joung Mun; Young Taek Chung; Hyun Seung Kim
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 10.  Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kuryan; Anjum Cheema; Roy S Chuck
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.