Literature DB >> 23991386

Visual performance after conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration: results at 1 year.

Jing Zhang1, Yue-Hua Zhou, Rui Li, Lei Tian.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare visual performance of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with iris-registration (Wg-LASIK group) and conventional LASIK (LASIK group) one year after surgery and analyze the correlation between wavefront aberrations and visual performance.
METHODS: Eight hundred and fifty-two myopic eyes of 430 patients were enrolled in this prospective study and divided into two groups: Wg-LASIK group (436 eyes) and LASIK group (416 eyes). A Wavescan Wavefront aberrometer was used to analyze Zernike coefficients and the root-mean-square (RMS) of higher order aberrations, and Optec 6500 visual function instrument was used to measure contrast sensitivity (CS) before and 3, 6, 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent (SE) in Wg-LASIK group was significantly better than those in LASIK group one year after surgery (P=0.024). Wg-LASIK eyes showed better CS values than LASIK eyes at all spatial frequencies with and without glare after surgery (P all<0.01). Moreover, the increase of higher RMS (RMSh), coma, RMS3, RMS4, RMS5 in Wg-LASIK group were significantly lower than those in LASIK group 1 year after surgery (P all<0.05). The increase of coma, spherical aberration (SA), RMS3 and RMS4 in Wg-LASIK and coma and RMS3 in LASIK group were negatively correlated with reduction of contrast sensitivity 1 year after surgery.
CONCLUSION: A significant better visual performance is got in Wg-LASIK group compared with LASIK group 1 year after surgery, and the Wg-LASIK is particularly suitable for eyes with high-magnitude RMSh.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aberration; contrast sensitivity; laser in situ keratomileusis; visual performance

Year:  2013        PMID: 23991386      PMCID: PMC3755311          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.04.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  29 in total

1.  Glare sensitivity and optical side effects 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Barbara Neeracher; Peter Senn; Isaak Schipper
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Wavefront-guided vs wavefront-optimized LASIK: a randomized clinical trial comparing contralateral eyes.

Authors:  Mohammad Miraftab; Mohammad A Seyedian; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Nayori Yamane; Kazunori Miyata; Tomokazu Samejima; Takahiro Hiraoka; Takahiro Kiuchi; Fumiki Okamoto; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yue-hua Zhou; Ning-li Wang; Rui Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2008-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Effect of NIDEK optimized aspheric transition zone ablation profile on higher order aberrations during LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Ryo Kosaki; Naoyuki Maeda; Hitoshi Hayashi; Takashi Fujikado; Shigeki Okamoto
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The relationship between anterior corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity in conventional LASIK.

Authors:  I-Jong Wang; Yi-Chen Sun; Yuan-Chieh Lee; Yu-Chih Hou; Fung-Rong Hu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.424

7.  Efficacy, predictability, and safety of wavefront-guided refractive laser treatment: metaanalysis.

Authors:  Usama Fares; Hanif Suleman; Mouhamed Ali Al-Aqaba; Ahamd Muneer Otri; Dalia G Said; Harminder S Dua
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Higher order wavefront aberrations of cornea and magnitude of refractive correction in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Tetsuro Oshika; Kazunori Miyata; Tadatoshi Tokunaga; Tomokazu Samejima; Shiro Amano; Sumiyoshi Tanaka; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Naoyuki Maeda; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Comparison of higher order aberrations after LASIK and LASEK for myopia.

Authors:  Colm McAlinden; Jonathan E Moore
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; Enrique España; Jose L Menezo
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  13 in total

1.  Preliminary results of a new intrastromal corneal ring segment as a tissue saving procedure in photorefractive keratectomy to correct moderate to high myopia.

Authors:  Sandro Coscarelli; Pablo Rodrigues; Guilherme Rocha; Leonardo Torquetti
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  [Innovations in refractive laser surgery 2014].

Authors:  T Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  The influence of optical aberrations in refractive surgery.

Authors:  Badescu Silvia Valentina; Barac Ramona; Schmitzer Speranta; Tataru Calin
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

4.  Effects of higher-order aberrations on contrast sensitivity in normal eyes of a large myopic population.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Zhao; Shi-Ming Li; Jing Lu; Hong-Min Song; Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Ning-Li Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Effect of Iris registration on visual outcome in wavefront-guided LASEK for myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Jong Joo Lee; Mee Kum Kim; Won Ryang Wee
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Effect of iris registration on outcomes of FEMTOLASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghoreishi; Zahra Naderi Beni; Afsaneh Naderi Beni; Farzan Kianersi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Li; Meng-Tian Kang; Ning-Li Wang; Samuel A Abariga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-18

8.  Visual, aberrometric, photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction after myopic wavefront-guided LASIK using a high-resolution aberrometer.

Authors:  Sarah Moussa; Alois K Dexl; Eva M Krall; Eva M Arlt; Günther Grabner; Josef Ruckhofer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-12

9.  Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations after SMILE and Wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Chen; Yan Wang; Jiamei Zhang; Shun-Nan Yang; Xiaojing Li; Lin Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Effect of Cap-Lenticule Diameter Difference on the Visual Outcome and Higher-Order Aberrations in SMILE: 0.4 mm versus 1.0 mm.

Authors:  Banu Torun Acar; Suphi Acar
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.