Literature DB >> 27500109

Comparison of corneal flaps created by Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers.

Qian Liu1, Yue-Hua Zhou1, Jing Zhang1, Yan Zheng1, Chang-Bin Zhai1, Jing Liu1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess and compare the morphology of corneal flaps created by the Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
METHODS: Four hundred eyes of 200 patients were enrolled in this study and divided into Wavelight FS200 groups (200 eyes) and Intralase FS60 groups (200 eyes). Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue OCT) was used to measure the corneal flap thickness of 36 specified measurements on each flap one week after surgery. Results were used to analyze the regularity, uniformity and accuracy of the two types of LASIK flaps.
RESULTS: The mean thickness of corneal flap and central flap was 105.71±4.72 µm and 105.39±4.50 µm in Wavelight FS200 group and 109.78±11.42 µm and 109.15 ±11.59 µm in Intralase FS60 group, respectively. The flaps made with the Wavelight FS200 femtosecond laser were thinner than those created by the Intralase FS60 femtosecond laser (P=0.000). Corneal flaps in the 2 groups were uniform and regular, showing an almost planar configuration. But the Wavelight FS200 group has more predictability and uniformity of flap creation. The mean deviation between achieved and attempted flap thickness was smaller in the Wavelight FS200 group than that in the Intralase FS60 group, which were 5.18±3.71 µm and 8.68±7.42 µm respectively. The deviation of more than 20 µm was 0.2% measurements in Wavelight FS200 group and 8.29% measurements in Intralase FS60 group.
CONCLUSION: The morphologies of flaps created by Wavelight FS200 are more uniform and thinner than those created by Intralase FS60.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography; Intralase FS60; Wavelight FS200; femtosecond laser; flap; laser in situ keratomileusis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27500109      PMCID: PMC4951655          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.07.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  18 in total

1.  Anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurement of LASIK flaps: femtosecond laser vs microkeratome.

Authors:  Yuehua Zhou; Lei Tian; NingLi Wang; Paul J Dougherty
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  LASIK flap creation with the Ziemer femtosecond laser in 787 consecutive eyes.

Authors:  Juhani Pietilä; Anne Huhtala; Markus Jääskeläinen; Jarmo Jylli; Petri Mäkinen; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  LASIK flap thickness profile and reproducibility of the standard vs zero compression Hansatome microkeratomes: three-dimensional display with Artemis VHF digital ultrasound.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Dan B Tran; Melvin A Sarayba; Zsolt Bor; Carrie Garufis; Yi-Jing Duh; Charles R Soltes; Tibor Juhasz; Ron M Kurtz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): evaluation of the calculated residual stromal bed thickness.

Authors:  Richard J Ou; Edward L Shaw; Ben J Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel; Leo J Maguire; Jay W McLaren; David O Hodge; William M Bourne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome for hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Raquel Gil-Cazorla; Miguel A Teus; Laura de Benito-Llopis; Dimitrios G Mikropoulos
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Buddy Russell; Michael A Ward; Keith P Thompson; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yuehua Zhou; Changbin Zhai; Lei Tian
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography.

Authors:  Perry S Binder; William B Trattler
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  4 in total

1.  Myopic LASIK Outcomes: Comparison of Three Different Femtosecond Lasers and a Mechanical Microkeratome Using the Same Excimer Laser.

Authors:  Juan Gros-Otero; Isabel Rodríguez-Pérez; Miguel A Teus; Andreas Katsanos; Dimitrios G Mikropoulos; Montserrat García-González
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-03-09

2.  Analysis of Macular and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Children with Refractory Amblyopia after Femtosecond Laser-assisted Laser In situ Keratomileusis: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Zhao; Yue-Hua Zhou; Jing Zhang; Wen-Bin Wei
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Evaluation of femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation in corneal refractive surgery for myopia: a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mohamed Nagy Elmohamady; Walid Abdelghaffar; Ahmed Daifalla; Tamer Salem
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-17

Review 4.  Anterior segment optical coherence tomography for evaluation of cornea and ocular surface.

Authors:  Mittanamalli S Sridhar; Raul Martin
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.848

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.