Literature DB >> 23912691

Q-value customized ablation (custom-Q) versus wavefront optimized ablation for primary myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Ahmed Tawfik1, Ahmed Mostafa Eid, Rabei Hasanen, Ismail A N Moftah.   

Abstract

Comparison between treatment with wavefront optimized and custom-Q laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablations. Our study included 400 eyes of 200 patients divided into two equal groups. All patients were treated for myopia and myopic astigmatism with LASIK. The first group was treated with wavefront optimized ablation and the second group with custom-Q ablation. They were examined preoperatively and postoperatively to assess asphericity, image quality, and other classical outcome parameters. The wavefront optimized ablation group comprised 200 eyes with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) of -5.2188 diopters (D) (range: -1.15 to -10.50 D); the mean Q-value changed from 0.30 preoperatively to 0.06 postoperatively. The custom-Q ablation group also comprised 200 eyes with a mean SE of -5.1575 D (range: -1.35 to -9.00 D); the mean Q-value changed from 0.32 preoperatively to 0.03 postoperatively. A statistically significant difference in postoperative change in Q-values (P = 0.02) and in postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.42) between the two groups was noted. There was no difference between the two groups regarding refractive correction. There was a marginally significant change in BSCVA (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) between the two groups, and less impairment in the corneal asphericity in the custom-Q group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23912691     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-013-9828-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  15 in total

1.  Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing, and corneal topography.

Authors:  J T Holladay; D R Dudeja; J Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Wavefront-optimized ablation profiles: theoretical background.

Authors:  Michael Mrochen; Christof Donitzky; Christian Wüllner; Joachim Löffler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective study.

Authors:  W Verdon; M Bullimore; R K Maloney
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-12

4.  Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  C R Munnerlyn; S J Koons; J Marshall
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Model for predicting the optical performance of the eye in refractive surgery.

Authors:  S Patel; J Marshall; F W Fitzke
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

6.  Aspheric photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser.

Authors:  T Seiler; U Genth; A Holschbach; M Derse
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1993 May-Jun

7.  New corneal shapes in keratorefractive surgery.

Authors:  S L Henslee; J J Rowsey
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Jens Bühren; Christoph Kühne; Alireza Mirshahi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Refractive surgery, optical aberrations, and visual performance.

Authors:  R A Applegate; H C Howland
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Disturbances in night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  D P O'Brart; C P Lohmann; F W Fitzke; G Klonos; M C Corbett; M G Kerr-Muir; J Marshall
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  3 in total

1.  Study of change in contrast sensitivity in relation to depth of ablation after wavefront optimized myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Mallikarjun M Heralgi; V Kavitha; Manisha Dwivedi; V Preethi; B V Roopasree; J Rajashekar; Ankit Deokar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Corneal curvature, asphericity, and aberrations after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia: A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Ya-Li Zhang; Xiang-Hui Xu; Li-Jun Cao; Lei Liu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with topography-guided or asphericity-adjusted derived data: a comparative contralateral eye study.

Authors:  Ermano M Alves; Adriana F Lyra; Manuela Tenório; Natália Mesquita; Carolina Bacelar; Afra Montenegro; Lucas Alves; Márcio Alves
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.