Literature DB >> 15721560

Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures.

Erica J Williams1, Sid P Bacon.   

Abstract

Cochlear compression in normal-hearing listeners was estimated at octave frequencies from 250 to 4000 Hz using a forward-masking paradigm. Temporal masking curves (TMCs) for a 10-dB SL signal were obtained with two maskers -- one equal in frequency to the signal and another an octave below the signal. The ratio of the slope of the off-frequency function to that of the mid-level portion of the on-frequency function was computed as an estimate of the amount of compression at each frequency. Compression was less frequency selective at low frequencies, so an average of the off-frequency slopes at high frequencies (1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) was used in computing the ratio for each signal frequency. Results indicated strong compression (approximately 0.15-0.30) at all frequencies using the averaged off-frequency slopes, indicating little difference in compression across frequencies. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input-output (I-O) functions were obtained for each subject at 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The slopes of the DPOAE I-O functions and the psychophysical growth rates were similar to one another, reinforcing the assumption that the forward-masking procedure is providing an estimate of cochlear compression, at least at frequencies from 1000 to 4000 Hz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15721560     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Effect of human auditory efferent feedback on cochlear gain and compression.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Vit Drga; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

3.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

4.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

6.  Auditory function and hearing loss in children and adults with Williams syndrome: cochlear impairment in individuals with otherwise normal hearing.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Marler; Jessica L Sitcovsky; Carolyn B Mervis; Doris J Kistler; Frederic L Wightman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.

Authors:  Amanda J Ortmann; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Estimates of compression at low and high frequencies using masking additivity in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson; Catherine G O'Hanlon; Vit Drga; Dhany Arifianto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Weakened Cochlear Nonlinearity During Human Aging and Perceptual Correlates.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Yeini C Guardia
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Use of psychometric-function slopes for forward-masked tones to investigate cochlear nonlinearity.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; Jessica Messersmith; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.