Literature DB >> 9786374

Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect?

E C Burton1, D A Troxclair, W P Newman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Autopsy often reveals new diagnoses of malignant neoplasms, but as technological advances to improve diagnosis during life have improved, autopsy rates have declined dramatically.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is still a high discordance rate between clinical and autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms despite increasing technological advances in diagnostic methods. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A 10-year retrospective study (1986-1995) of all autopsies performed at the Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans. PARTICIPANTS: All patients autopsied, excluding preterm fetuses, at the Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans, by both Tulane and Louisiana State University Schools of Medicine in which consent was obtained or authorization given from the Orleans Parish Coroner's Office. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms.
RESULTS: A total of 1625 cases were reviewed of which 520 preterm fetuses were excluded. Of the remaining 1105 cases, 654 were male and 451 were female. The mean age was 48.3 years (range, 1-98 years). A total of 433 neoplasms were diagnosed, 250 of which were malignant. One hundred eleven malignant neoplasms in 100 patients had been either undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, and in 57 patients, the immediate cause of death could be attributed to the malignant neoplasm. The discordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms in this study is 44%, which is similar to previously reported studies.
CONCLUSION: The discordance rate between clinical and autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms is large and confirms the importance of the postmortem examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9786374     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.14.1245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  16 in total

1.  [Autopsies 2010. Is death still teaching the living?].

Authors:  C Tóth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Death of the teaching autopsy: advances in technology have not reduced the value of the autopsy.

Authors:  Gema Frühbeck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

3.  Missed diagnosis in hematological patients-an autopsy study.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Galtarossa Xavier; Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira; Luciano José Megale Costa; Thais Mauad; Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Calliope Maris; Benoît Martin; Jacques Creteur; Myriam Remmelink; Michael Piagnerelli; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent; Pieter Demetter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Post mortem examinations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: challenges and chances.

Authors:  Paola Angelini; Cynthia Hawkins; Normand Laperriere; Eric Bouffet; Ute Bartels
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Are coroners' necropsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a "view and grant" system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales.

Authors:  G N Rutty; R M Duerden; N Carter; J C Clark
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Validity of the hospital discharge diagnosis in epidemiologic studies of biliopancreatic pathology. PANKRAS II Study Group.

Authors:  M Porta; S Costafreda; N Malats; L Guarner; M Soler; J M Gubern; E García-Olivares; M Andreu; A Salas; J M Corominas; J Alguacil; A Carrato; J Rifà; F X Real
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Are autopsies useful? Do premorbid findings predict postmortem results in head and neck cancer patients?

Authors:  C R Jennings; P J Bradley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  The 'Lost' frontier of clinical medicine: Have we reached a point of no return?

Authors:  Bharat Dalvi
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-01

10.  Clinico-pathological discrepancies in a general university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Fabiana Kotovicz; Thais Mauad; Paulo H N Saldiva
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.