G Kobelt1, P Lindgren, A Singh, L Klareskog. 1. European Health Economics SAS, 492 chemin des Laurens, F-06530 Spéracèdes, France. gisela.kobelt@he-europe.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness of combination treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate in comparison with monotherapies in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using a new model that incorporates both functional status and disease activity. METHODS: Effectiveness data were based on a 2 year trial in 682 patients with active RA (TEMPO). Data on resource consumption and utility related to function and disease activity were obtained from a survey of 616 patients in Sweden. A Markov model was constructed with five states according to functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) subdivided into high and low disease activity. The cost for each quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained was estimated by Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Disease activity had a highly significant effect on utilities, independently of HAQ. For resource consumption, only HAQ was a significant predictor, with the exception of sick leave. Compared with methotrexate alone, etanercept plus methotrexate over 2 years increased total costs by 14,221 euros and led to a QALY gain of 0.38. When treatment was continued for 10 years, incremental costs were 42,148 euros for a QALY gain of 0.91. The cost per QALY gained was 37,331 euros and 46,494 euros, respectively. The probability that the cost effectiveness ratio is below a threshold of 50,000 euros/QALY is 88%. CONCLUSION: Incorporating the influence of disease activity into this new model allows better assessment of the effects of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment on patients' general wellbeing. In this analysis, the cost per QALY gained with combination treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone falls within the acceptable range.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness of combination treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate in comparison with monotherapies in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using a new model that incorporates both functional status and disease activity. METHODS: Effectiveness data were based on a 2 year trial in 682 patients with active RA (TEMPO). Data on resource consumption and utility related to function and disease activity were obtained from a survey of 616 patients in Sweden. A Markov model was constructed with five states according to functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) subdivided into high and low disease activity. The cost for each quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained was estimated by Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Disease activity had a highly significant effect on utilities, independently of HAQ. For resource consumption, only HAQ was a significant predictor, with the exception of sick leave. Compared with methotrexate alone, etanercept plus methotrexate over 2 years increased total costs by 14,221 euros and led to a QALY gain of 0.38. When treatment was continued for 10 years, incremental costs were 42,148 euros for a QALY gain of 0.91. The cost per QALY gained was 37,331 euros and 46,494 euros, respectively. The probability that the cost effectiveness ratio is below a threshold of 50,000 euros/QALY is 88%. CONCLUSION: Incorporating the influence of disease activity into this new model allows better assessment of the effects of anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment on patients' general wellbeing. In this analysis, the cost per QALY gained with combination treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate compared with methotrexate alone falls within the acceptable range.
Authors: E J Kroot; M A van Leeuwen; M H van Rijswijk; M L Prevoo; M A Van 't Hof; L B van De Putte; P L van Riel Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: F Wolfe; D M Mitchell; J T Sibley; J F Fries; D A Bloch; C A Williams; P W Spitz; M Haga; S M Kleinheksel; M A Cathey Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1994-04
Authors: Sarah Dewilde; Bernd Brüggenjürgen; Christoph Nienaber; Jochen Senges; Robert Welte; Stefan N Willich Journal: Eur J Health Econ Date: 2011-04-12