Literature DB >> 10025930

Economic consequences of the progression of rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden.

G Kobelt1, K Eberhardt, L Jönsson, B Jönsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a simulation model for analysis of the cost-effectiveness of treatments that affect the progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: The Markov model was developed on the basis of a Swedish cohort of 116 patients with early RA who were followed up for 5 years. The majority of patients had American College of Rheumatology (ACR) functional class II disease, and Markov states indicating disease severity were defined based on Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores. Costs were calculated from data on resource utilization and patients' work capacity. Utilities (preference weights for health states) were assessed using the EQ-5D (EuroQol) questionnaire. Hypothetical treatment interventions were simulated to illustrate the model.
RESULTS: The cohort distribution among the 6 Markov states clearly showed the progression of the disease over 5 years of followup. Costs increased with increasing severity of the Markov states, and total costs over 5 years were higher for patients who were in more severe Markov states at diagnosis. Utilities correlated well with the Markov states, and the EQ-5D was able to discriminate between patients with different HAQ scores within ACR functional class II.
CONCLUSION: The Markov model was able to assess disease progression and costs in RA. The model can therefore be a useful tool in calculating the cost-effectiveness of different interventions aimed at changing the progression of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10025930     DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(199902)42:2<347::AID-ANR18>3.0.CO;2-P

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  43 in total

Review 1.  Including adverse drug events in economic evaluations of anti-tumour necrosis factor-α drugs for adult rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of economic decision analytic models.

Authors:  Eleanor M Heather; Katherine Payne; Mark Harrison; Deborah P M Symmons
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  [Conceptual and methodological basics of cost assessments in rheumatology].

Authors:  J Ruof; J L Hülsemann; T Mittendorf; J-M von der Schulenburg; H Zeidler; S Merkesdal
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 3.  International variation in resource utilisation and treatment costs for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hubertus Rosery; Rito Bergemann; Stefanie Maxion-Bergemann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: II. The contribution of leflunomide to efficiency.

Authors:  Peter K Schädlich; Henning Zeidler; Angela Zink; Erika Gromnica-Ihle; Matthias Schneider; Christoph Straub; Josef G Brecht; Eduard Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The cost effectiveness of infliximab for severe treatment-resistant rheumatoid arthritis in the UK.

Authors:  Marco Barbieri; John B Wong; Michael Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Sensory and vascular changes in a rat monoarthritis model: prophylactic and therapeutic effects of meloxicam.

Authors:  Javeria Ali Hashmi; Kiran Yashpal; David W Holdsworth; James L Henry
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 7.  Efficacy, tolerability and cost effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Michael T Nurmohamed; Ben A C Dijkmans
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  TNF inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: costs and outcomes in a follow up study of patients with RA treated with etanercept or infliximab in southern Sweden.

Authors:  G Kobelt; K Eberhardt; P Geborek
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis: a critical review of measures used to define health States.

Authors:  Nick Bansback; Roberta Ara; Jonathan Karnon; Aslam Anis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Cost-utility of different treatment strategies after the failure of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor in rheumatoid arthritis in the Finnish setting.

Authors:  Taru A Hallinen; Erkki J O Soini; Kari Eklund; Kari Puolakka
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.