Literature DB >> 10739728

Cost-effectiveness of intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus; results from the DIGAMI study.

B Almbrand1, M Johannesson, B Sjöstrand, K Malmberg, L Rydén.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of the present analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus based on the results of the Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) study. In this study 620 patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction were randomized to intense insulin treatment (insulin group) or to serve as controls given standard antidiabetic therapy. Mortality was significantly reduced in the insulin group. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated as the incremental cost per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gained of intense insulin treatment. The incremental costs were estimated as the difference in health care costs and indirect costs (labour production) during the first year of follow-up plus the future costs of increased survival. The life-years gained were based on the 5-year long-term follow-up experience and an assumed annual 20% mortality risk for all patients thereafter. The health care costs were Euro 975 higher in the insulin group during the first year of follow-up, mainly due to a longer period of initial hospitalization related to the institution of multidose insulin. The estimated discounted gain in life-years of the insulin treatment was 0.94 years without and 0.66 with quality of life adjustment, respectively. The cost per life-year gained by intense insulin treatment was Euro 16 900 and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was Euro 24 100. Thus the estimated cost-effectiveness ratios were relatively low.
CONCLUSION: The results of the DIGAMI study indicate that intense insulin treatment after an acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus has an acceptable level of cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10739728     DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  13 in total

1.  Discounting health effects in pharmacoeconomic evaluations: current controversies.

Authors:  J M Bos; Maarten J Postma; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost of breast cancer in Sweden in 2002.

Authors:  Mathias Lidgren; Nils Wilking; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-03

Review 3.  Diabetes and stroke: part two--treating diabetes and stress hyperglycemia in hospitalized stroke patients.

Authors:  Valentine Burroughs; Jesse Weinberger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Cost effectiveness of preventive interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sylvia M C Vijgen; Mirjam Hoogendoorn; Caroline A Baan; G Ardine de Wit; Wien Limburg; Talitha L Feenstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cost effectiveness of etanercept (Enbrel) in combination with methotrexate in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis based on the TEMPO trial.

Authors:  G Kobelt; P Lindgren; A Singh; L Klareskog
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-02-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis--a review of the literature and a reference model.

Authors:  N Zethraeus; F Borgström; O Ström; J A Kanis; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent and control diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rui Li; Ping Zhang; Lawrence E Barker; Farah M Chowdhury; Xuanping Zhang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 17.152

8.  Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women: a study based on data from Sweden.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Anders Oden; Frederik Borgstrom; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  TNF inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: costs and outcomes in a follow up study of patients with RA treated with etanercept or infliximab in southern Sweden.

Authors:  G Kobelt; K Eberhardt; P Geborek
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Economic benefits of intensive insulin therapy in critically Ill patients: the targeted insulin therapy to improve hospital outcomes (TRIUMPH) project.

Authors:  Archana R Sadhu; Alfonso C Ang; Leslie A Ingram-Drake; Dorothy S Martinez; Willa A Hsueh; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.