H Schulze-Koops1, M Deeg, C Runge, T Volmer, J G Brecht. 1. Rheumaeinheit, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336, München, Deutschland. hendrik.schulze-koops@med.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The TEMPO study has shown that the combination of etanercept and methotrexat (MTX) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is superior to monotherapy. It further suggested that remission of RA is a realistic treatment objective. A health-economic assessment of the combination needs to demonstrate the suitability of the combination for daily clinical practice taking economic aspects into consideration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the 686 patients in the TEMPO study, a re-analysis was carried out in the form of a Monte-Carlo-Markov-Chain simulation. Study types were cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis. Comparators were combined etanercept and MTX vs. MTX alone; the perspective was that of society as a whole. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the combination is <euro>21,300 per life year in remission as compared with MTX alone. The incremental cost-utility ratio of the combination is <euro>38,700 per quality-adjusted life year. CONCLUSION: Both health-economic parameters suggest to adopt the combination therapy into daily clinical practice of RA patients.
BACKGROUND: The TEMPO study has shown that the combination of etanercept and methotrexat (MTX) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is superior to monotherapy. It further suggested that remission of RA is a realistic treatment objective. A health-economic assessment of the combination needs to demonstrate the suitability of the combination for daily clinical practice taking economic aspects into consideration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the 686 patients in the TEMPO study, a re-analysis was carried out in the form of a Monte-Carlo-Markov-Chain simulation. Study types were cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis. Comparators were combined etanercept and MTX vs. MTX alone; the perspective was that of society as a whole. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the combination is <euro>21,300 per life year in remission as compared with MTX alone. The incremental cost-utility ratio of the combination is <euro>38,700 per quality-adjusted life year. CONCLUSION: Both health-economic parameters suggest to adopt the combination therapy into daily clinical practice of RApatients.
Authors: Lars Klareskog; Désirée van der Heijde; Julien P de Jager; Andrew Gough; Joachim Kalden; Michel Malaise; Emilio Martín Mola; Karel Pavelka; Jacques Sany; Lucas Settas; Joseph Wajdula; Ronald Pedersen; Saeed Fatenejad; Marie Sanda Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-02-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Désirée van der Heijde; Lars Klareskog; Vicente Rodriguez-Valverde; Catalin Codreanu; Horatiu Bolosiu; Jose Melo-Gomes; Jesus Tornero-Molina; Joseph Wajdula; Ronald Pedersen; Saeed Fatenejad Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2006-04
Authors: Nick J Bansback; Dean A Regier; Roberta Ara; Alan Brennan; Kamran Shojania; John M Esdaile; Aslam H Anis; Carlo A Marra Journal: Drugs Date: 2005 Impact factor: 9.546