Literature DB >> 15700173

MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent.

Arne S Borthne1, Michael Abdelnoor, Johan C Hellund, Jonn T Geitung, Trygve Storaas, Kjell I Gjesdal, Nils-E Kløw.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of MR imaging and level of adverse effects with increasing concentrations of gastrografin. This is a prospective study with 24 healthy volunteers which were randomised into four groups receiving 50%, 25%, 10% and 0% gastrografin. The endpoint was bowel image quality based on distension, signal homogeneity and wall delineation evaluated by three independent radiologists, and the maximum bowel diameter at three different levels. The subjects also scored any adverse events on a 1-5 scale. The interradiologist agreement was relatively good, with kappa values varying between 0.81 and 0.41. Improved bowel distension and image quality were achieved with increasing concentrations. But significant dose-response effects were found between increasing osmolalities and the bowel diameters and also versus the score of adverse events. The most frequent adverse reactions were diarrhea, nausea and lack of palatability. There is a gradient relationship between increasing osmolality of gastrografin and improved image quality and the score of adverse effects. The optimum concentration of gastrografin is dependent of the tolerance of the adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15700173     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2636-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

Review 1.  MRI of the small and large bowel.

Authors:  J F Debatin; M A Patak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis.

Authors:  A Rieber; A Aschoff; K Nüssle; D Wruk; R Tomczak; M Reinshagen; G Adler; H J Brambs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Bowel MR imaging with oral Gastrografin: an experimental study with healthy volunteers.

Authors:  A S Borthne; J B Dormagen; K I Gjesdal; T Storaas; I Lygren; J T Geitung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-07-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  [MRI with oral filling in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases].

Authors:  C Born; B Nagel; G Leinsinger; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.

Authors:  A Donner; M Eliasziw
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Burcu Narin; Waleed Ajaj; Susanne Göhde; Jost Langhorst; Haldun Akgöz; Guido Gerken; Stefan G Rühm; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Gastrointestinal contrast agents for MR imaging.

Authors:  J J Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Multisite study of the safety and efficacy of LumenHance, a new gastrointestinal contrast agent for MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  W C Small; D D Macchi; J R Parker; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Blueberry juice: preliminary evaluation as an oral contrast agent in gastrointestinal MR imaging.

Authors:  K Hiraishi; I Narabayashi; O Fujita; K Yamamoto; A Sagami; Y Hisada; Y Saika; I Adachi; H Hasegawa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  A comparative study between Gd-DTPA and oral magnetic particles (OMP) as gastrointestinal (GI) contrast agents for MRI of the abdomen.

Authors:  L Vlahos; A Gouliamos; A Athanasopoulou; G Kotoulas; W Claus; A Hatziioannou; A Kalovidouris; C Papavasiliou
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessment of Crohn's disease in the small bowel: Prospective comparison of magnetic resonance enteroclysis with conventional enteroclysis.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Emanuele Casciani; Elisabetta Polettini; Silvia Lanciotti; Luca Bertini; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Osmolarity: a decisive parameter of bowel agents in intestinal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Arne S Borthne; Michael Abdelnoor; Trygve Storaas; Claude Pierre-Jerome; Nils-E Kløw
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis.

Authors:  Anne Negaard; Vemund Paulsen; Leiv Sandvik; Audun Elnaes Berstad; Arne Borthne; Kirsti Try; Idar Lygren; Tryggve Storaas; Nils-Einar Klow
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Gradient-enhanced volume rendering: an image processing strategy to facilitate whole small bowel imaging with MRI.

Authors:  Michael Wyss; Johannes M Froehlich; Michael A Patak; Christoph F Juli; Markus B Scheidegger; Christoph L Zollikofer; Klaus U Wentz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of colonic transit time using MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Sonja Buhmann; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Roland Ladurner; Thomas Mussack; Maximilian F Reiser; Andreas Lienemann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound.

Authors:  Arne S Borthne; Michael Abdelnoor; Jarle Rugtveit; Göri Perminow; Tor Reiseter; Nils-Einar Kløw
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic performance of MRI for detection of intestinal fistulas in patients with complicated inflammatory bowel conditions.

Authors:  S Schmidt; P Chevallier; B Bessoud; J-Y Meuwly; C Felley; R Meuli; P Schnyder; A Denys
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Value of cine MRI for better visualization of the proximal small bowel in normal individuals.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Roberto Vargas; Chikako Tanaka; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.