Literature DB >> 10997423

MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis.

A Rieber1, A Aschoff, K Nüssle, D Wruk, R Tomczak, M Reinshagen, G Adler, H J Brambs.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the additional findings of MRI following small bowel enteroclysis and to compare the efficacy of negative and positive intraluminal contrast agents. Fifty patients with inflammatory or tumorous small bowel disease were investigated by small bowel enteroclysis and consecutive MRI using breathhold protocol (T1-weighted fast low-angle shot, T2-weighted turbo spin echo). Patients were randomly assigned to either receiving a positive oral (Magnevist, Schering, Berlin, Germany) or a negative oral MR contrast media (Abdoscan, Nycomed, Oslo, Norway). The pattern of contrast distribution, the contrast effect, presence of artifacts, as well as bowel wall and extraluminal changes, were determined and compared between the contrast type using Fischer's exact test. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for MRI and enteroclysis were calculated. Twenty-seven patients had clinically proven Crohn's disease and two patients surgically proven small bowel tumours. Magnetic resonance imaging had important additional findings as abscesses and fistulae in 20 patients. Surgically compared sensitivities were 100 and 0% for MRI and enteroclysis, for the detection of abscesses, and 83.3 and 17 % for the diagnosis of fistulae, respectively. Bowel wall thickening was more reliably detected with use of positive oral contrast media without intravenous enhancement (p < 0.001), whereas postcontrast negative oral contrast media allow for a superior detection (p < 0.001). T2-weighted sequences were necessary with use of negative oral contrast media, because loop abscesses may be masked. Magnetic resonance imaging should be performed in all patients with suspicion of extraintestinal complications, because the complications are more reliably detected by MRI. Negative oral contrast media show advantages with the use of intravenous contrast but can mask loop abscesses using only T1-weighted imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10997423     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

Review 1.  MRI in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Michael S Gee; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques.

Authors:  Klaus Scheffler; Stefan Lehnhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Burcu Narin; Waleed Ajaj; Susanne Göhde; Jost Langhorst; Haldun Akgöz; Guido Gerken; Stefan G Rühm; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent.

Authors:  Arne S Borthne; Michael Abdelnoor; Johan C Hellund; Jonn T Geitung; Trygve Storaas; Kjell I Gjesdal; Nils-E Kløw
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease.

Authors:  Stefan K Gölder; Andreas G Schreyer; Esther Endlicher; Stefan Feuerbach; Jürgen Schölmerich; Frank Kullmann; Johannes Seitz; Gerhard Rogler; Hans Herfarth
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: definitions and diagnosis.

Authors:  E F Stange; S P L Travis; S Vermeire; C Beglinger; L Kupcinkas; K Geboes; A Barakauskiene; V Villanacci; A Von Herbay; B F Warren; C Gasche; H Tilg; Stefan W Schreiber; J Schölmerich; W Reinisch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis.

Authors:  Anne Negaard; Vemund Paulsen; Leiv Sandvik; Audun Elnaes Berstad; Arne Borthne; Kirsti Try; Idar Lygren; Tryggve Storaas; Nils-Einar Klow
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Updating magnetic resonance imaging of small bowel: imaging protocols and clinical indications.

Authors:  Jiong Zhu; Jian-Rong Xu; Hong-Xia Gong; Yan Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Imaging of the gastrointestinal tract-novel technologies.

Authors:  Jens Brøndum Frøkjaer; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography: the future of small bowel imaging.

Authors:  Mark E Baker; David M Einstein; Joseph C Veniero
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.