Literature DB >> 16491348

Osmolarity: a decisive parameter of bowel agents in intestinal magnetic resonance imaging.

Arne S Borthne1, Michael Abdelnoor, Trygve Storaas, Claude Pierre-Jerome, Nils-E Kløw.   

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the importance of the osmolarity of different oral agents for bowel distension and the level of related adverse events. The longitudinal design included the exposition of different oral MR agents on two separate occasions. Four groups of volunteers were randomly given 350 ml gastrografin of three different concentrations and water. On the second occasion they received mannitol, iohexol or iodixanol with equivalent osmolarities, but the control group (water) received mannitol. We recorded the outcomes as the degree of bowel distension determined as the mean bowel section area and the total level of discomfort recorded from a visual analogue scale (VAS). The statistical analysis included scatter plots with the best-fitted line with linear regression to study the association between osmolarity and section area and the association between osmolarity and adverse events. A dose-response association was found between increasing osmolarity levels and bowel area in square centimeters (P = 0.00001). A similar dose-response association existed between increasing levels of osmolarity and adverse events (P = 0.001). Osmolarity appears to be more important for bowel distension than the physico-chemical characteristics of the nonabsorbable oral agents. The optimum osmolarity level is determined by the patient's tolerance of the adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16491348     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0063-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

Review 1.  MRI of the small and large bowel.

Authors:  J F Debatin; M A Patak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Small bowel MRI using water as a contrast medium.

Authors:  D J Lomas; M J Graves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Polyethylene glycol solution as an oral contrast agent for MR imaging of the small bowel.

Authors:  A Laghi; I Carbone; C Catalano; R Iannaccone; P Paolantonio; I Baeli; S Trenna; R Passariello
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic-resonance imaging.

Authors:  M A Patak; J M Froehlich; C von Weymarn; M A Ritz; C L Zollikofer; K Wentz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Small bowel magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Klaus Schunk
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-12

6.  [MRI with oral filling in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases].

Authors:  C Born; B Nagel; G Leinsinger; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Gastrointestinal contrast agents for MR imaging.

Authors:  J J Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution.

Authors:  N Gourtsoyiannis; N Papanikolaou; J Grammatikakis; T Maris; P Prassopoulos
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. Iohexol of different concentrations as a gastrointestinal contrast medium.

Authors:  M Lönnemark; A Magnusson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Fatal colonic explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  M A Bigard; P Gaucher; C Lassalle
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  6 in total

1.  A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn's disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis.

Authors:  Anne Negaard; Vemund Paulsen; Leiv Sandvik; Audun Elnaes Berstad; Arne Borthne; Kirsti Try; Idar Lygren; Tryggve Storaas; Nils-Einar Klow
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Crohn's Disease: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Marysol Biondi; Eleonora Bicci; Ginevra Danti; Federica Flammia; Giuditta Chiti; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Federico Bruno; Alessandra Borgheresi; Roberta Grassi; Francesca Grassi; Roberta Fusco; Vincenza Granata; Andrea Giovagnoni; Antonio Barile; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-15

3.  MRI of the small bowel: can sufficient bowel distension be achieved with small volumes of oral contrast?

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Christiane A Kuehle; Sebastian Herbig; Sebastian Haag; Susanne C Ladd; Joerg Barkhausen; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Quantitative and qualitative bowel analysis using mannitol, water and iodine-based endoluminal contrast agent on 64-row detector CT.

Authors:  K Prakashini; Chandan Kakkar; Charudutt Sambhaji; Chandrakant M Shetty; Vedula Rajanikanth Rao
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Enterography: Focused on Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  So Mi Lee; Woo Sun Kim; Young Hun Choi
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2015-09-25

6.  The first joint ESGAR/ ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging.

Authors:  S A Taylor; F Avni; C G Cronin; C Hoeffel; S H Kim; A Laghi; M Napolitano; P Petit; J Rimola; D J Tolan; M R Torkzad; M Zappa; G Bhatnagar; C A J Puylaert; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.