Literature DB >> 15689709

How salient is the silent period? The role of the silent period in the prognosis of upper extremity motor recovery after severe stroke.

Annette A van Kuijk1, Jaco W Pasman, Alexander C H Geurts, Henk T Hendricks.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been successful in the prediction of motor recovery in acute stroke patients with initially severe paresis or paralysis of the upper extremity. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) appear to have a high specificity but a rather low sensitivity with regard to motor recovery. The silent period (SP) has been proposed as an additional factor to the MEP for predicting motor recovery that might optimize the sensitivity of TMS. The authors reviewed the literature and case series focusing on the additional value of the SP to the MEP for predicting poststroke hand motor recovery. Studies that have analyzed the SP for predicting poststroke motor recovery have rather inconsistent results and suffer from heterogeneity in technical methods, methodology, and patient characteristics. In most studies, prolonged SPs have been found immediately after stroke, whereas in the (sub)acute phase thereafter, different patterns of SP duration have been found. These differences are thought to be related to stroke localization, though contraction-induced reduction phenomena and recovery-related intracortical phenomena may also be responsible. Although the SP might be used to identify clinically silent or minor strokes, in acute stroke patients with initial severe paresis or paralysis, the SP seems to have no additional value to MEP for predicting poststroke motor recovery. Nevertheless, the SP (poststroke-reduced SPs and contraction-induced inhibitory phenomena) has been proposed as a prognostic factor for poststroke spasticity. This review emphasizes the significance of the SP in predicting poststroke motor recovery and spasticity. Although the relation among the SP, recovery-related intracortical phenomena, and spasticity remains unclear, a neurophysiologic model underlying the SP is discussed. However, more research is needed on the value of the SP for predicting poststroke spasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689709     DOI: 10.1097/01.wnp.0000150975.83249.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  14 in total

1.  Ipsilateral Motor Pathways and Transcallosal Inhibition During Lower Limb Movement After Stroke.

Authors:  Brice T Cleland; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Mechanisms of short-term training-induced reaching improvement in severely hemiparetic stroke patients: a TMS study.

Authors:  Michelle L Harris-Love; Susanne M Morton; Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  EMG breakthrough during cortical silent period in congenital hemiparesis: a descriptive case series.

Authors:  Maíra C Lixandrão; James W Stinear; Tonya Rich; Chao-Ying Chen; Tim Feyma; Gregg D Meekins; Bernadette T Gillick
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Role of Interhemispheric Cortical Interactions in Poststroke Motor Function.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Lewis A Wheaton; Whitney A Gray; Mary Alice Saltão da Silva; Steven L Wolf; Michael R Borich
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke.

Authors:  Eric Zarahn; Leeor Alon; Sophia L Ryan; Ronald M Lazar; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Cornelius Weiller; Randolph S Marshall; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation as an investigative tool for motor dysfunction and recovery in stroke: an overview for neurorehabilitation clinicians.

Authors:  Mar Cortes; Randie M Black-Schaffer; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-05-24

7.  Prediction of Motor Function Recovery after Subcortical Stroke: Case Series of Activation PET and TMS Studies.

Authors:  Se Hee Jung; Yu Kyeong Kim; Sang Eum Kim; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-08-27

8.  Motor evoked potential latency and duration from tibialis anterior in individuals with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Brice T Cleland; Emily Sisel; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 9.  Anatomo-Functional Origins of the Cortical Silent Period: Spotlight on the Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  David Zeugin; Silvio Ionta
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  Impact of early applied upper limb stimulation: the EXPLICIT-stroke programme design.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Carel G M Meskers; Erwin E van Wegen; Guus J Lankhorst; Alexander C H Geurts; Annet A van Kuijk; Eline Lindeman; Anne Visser-Meily; Erwin de Vlugt; J Hans Arendzen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.