Literature DB >> 34059935

Motor evoked potential latency and duration from tibialis anterior in individuals with chronic stroke.

Brice T Cleland1, Emily Sisel2, Sangeetha Madhavan3.   

Abstract

Ipsilateral motor pathways from the contralesional hemisphere to the paretic limbs may be upregulated to compensate for impaired function after stroke. Onset latency and duration of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provide insight into compensatory pathways but have been understudied in the lower limb. This study assessed MEP onset latency and duration in the lower limb after stroke, and compared ipsilateral and contralateral MEPs in the paretic and non-paretic limb. We hypothesized that: (1) onset latency would be longer for ipsilateral than contralateral MEPs and longer for the paretic than the non-paretic limb, and (2) duration would be shorter for ipsilateral than contralateral MEPs and longer for the paretic than the non-paretic limb. Data were collected as a part of a pre-test of a randomized controlled trial. TMS was applied to the ipsilateral and contralateral hemisphere of the paretic and non-paretic limb. MEP onset latency and duration were calculated from the tibialis anterior. Thirty-five participants with chronic stroke were included in the final analysis. Onset latency was longer in the paretic than the non-paretic limb (~ 6.0 ms) and longer after ipsilateral than contralateral stimulation (~ 1.8 ms). Duration was longer in the paretic than the non-paretic limb (~ 9.2 ms) and longer after contralateral than ipsilateral stimulation (~ 5.2 ms). Ipsilateral MEPs may be elicited through ipsilateral pathways with fewer fibers with a higher activation threshold and/or greater spinal branching. MEPs from the paretic limb may reflect slower central motor conduction, peripheral changes, or changes in motor pathway.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lower extremity; Neural pathways; Stroke rehabilitation; TMS

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34059935      PMCID: PMC8369391          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06144-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  64 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity and sedentary behaviors in people with stroke living in the community: a systematic review.

Authors:  Coralie English; Patricia J Manns; Claire Tucak; Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-12

2.  Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke.

Authors:  J Netz; T Lammers; V Hömberg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Downregulating Aberrant Motor Evoked Potential Synergies of the Lower Extremity Post Stroke During TMS of the Contralesional Hemisphere.

Authors:  Andrew Q Tan; Jon Shemmell; Yasin Y Dhaher
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Characteristics of motor unit discharge in subjects with hemiparesis.

Authors:  J J Gemperline; S Allen; D Walk; W Z Rymer
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  J V Escudero; J Sancho; D Bautista; M Escudero; J López-Trigo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  How salient is the silent period? The role of the silent period in the prognosis of upper extremity motor recovery after severe stroke.

Authors:  Annette A van Kuijk; Jaco W Pasman; Alexander C H Geurts; Henk T Hendricks
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.177

7.  Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee; Robert Côté; Liam Durcan; Joseph Carlton
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Hemiparetic stroke alters vastus lateralis myosin heavy chain profiles between the paretic and nonparetic muscles.

Authors:  Michael J McKenzie; Shuzhen Yu; Steven J Prior; Richard F Macko; Charlene E Hafer-Macko
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 4.674

9.  Training-Induced Neural Plasticity and Strength Are Amplified After Stroke.

Authors:  Yao Sun; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.230

10.  Clinical Value of the Assessment of Changes in MEP Duration with Voluntary Contraction.

Authors:  Marisa Brum; Christopher Cabib; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Role of the Contra-Lesional Corticoreticular Tract in Motor Recovery of the Paretic Leg in Stroke: A Mini-Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang; Min Jye Cho
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.473

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.