Literature DB >> 21343522

Mechanisms of short-term training-induced reaching improvement in severely hemiparetic stroke patients: a TMS study.

Michelle L Harris-Love1, Susanne M Morton, Monica A Perez, Leonardo G Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The neurophysiological mechanisms underlying improved upper-extremity motor skills have been partially investigated in patients with good motor recovery but are poorly understood in more impaired individuals, the majority of stroke survivors.
OBJECTIVE: The authors studied changes in primary motor cortex (M1) excitability (motor evoked potentials [MEPs], contralateral and ipsilateral silent periods [CSPs and ISPs] using transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS]) associated with training-induced reaching improvement in stroke patients with severe arm paresis (n = 11; Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer score (F-M) = 27 ± 6).
METHODS: All patients underwent a single session of reaching training focused on moving the affected hand from a resting site to a target placed at 80% of maximum forward reaching amplitude in response to a visual "GO" cue. Triceps contribute primarily as agonist and biceps primarily as antagonist to the trained forward reaching movement. Response times were recorded for each reaching movement.
RESULTS: Preceding training (baseline), greater interhemispheric inhibition (measured by ISP) in the affected triceps muscle, reflecting inhibition from the nonlesioned to the lesioned M1, was observed in patients with lower F-M scores (more severe motor impairment). Training-induced improvements in reaching were greater in patients with slower response times at baseline. Increased MEP amplitudes and decreased ISPs and CSPs were observed in the affected triceps but not in the biceps muscle after training.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that along with training-induced motor improvements, training-specific modulation of intrahemispheric and interhemispheric mechanisms occurs after reaching practice in chronic stroke patients with substantial arm impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21343522      PMCID: PMC3098309          DOI: 10.1177/1545968310395600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  74 in total

1.  Dynamic inferior stabilizers of the shoulder joint.

Authors:  A M Halder; C G Halder; K D Zhao; S W O'Driscoll; B F Morrey; K N An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Function of the long head of the biceps at the shoulder: electromyographic analysis.

Authors:  A S Levy; B T Kelly; S A Lintner; D C Osbahr; K P Speer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J Liepert; I Uhde; S Gräf; O Leidner; C Weiller
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Processing of multiple kinematic signals in the cerebellum and motor cortices.

Authors:  M T Johnson; T J Ebner
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2000-09

5.  The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Zafiris J Daskalakis; Bruce K Christensen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Lailoma Roshan; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke.

Authors:  J Liepert; F Hamzei; C Weiller
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Improving hand function in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Wolf Muellbacher; Coletta Richards; Ulf Ziemann; George Wittenberg; Deborah Weltz; Babak Boroojerdi; Leonardo Cohen; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2002-08

8.  Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke.

Authors:  Toshio Shimizu; Akiko Hosaki; Taro Hino; Masaru Sato; Tetsuo Komori; Shunsaku Hirai; Paolo M Rossini
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Central fatigue and motor cortical excitability during repeated shortening and lengthening actions.

Authors:  Wolfgang N Löscher; Maria M Nordlund
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation.

Authors:  A Currà; N Modugno; M Inghilleri; M Manfredi; M Hallett; A Berardelli
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-12-24       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  34 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Training-induced modifications of corticospinal reactivity in severely affected stroke survivors.

Authors:  Ruth N Barker; Sandra G Brauer; Benjamin K Barry; Toby J Gill; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Stratifying chronic stroke patients based on the influence of contralesional motor cortices: An inter-hemispheric inhibition study.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Manshi Li; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; John Lee; Stephen Jones; Ken Sakaie; Xiaofeng Wang; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the prediction and enhancement of rehabilitation treatment effects.

Authors:  Michelle Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Short-Duration and Intensive Training Improves Long-Term Reaching Performance in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Hyeshin Park; Sujin Kim; Carolee J Winstein; James Gordon; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 7.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Biomarkers and predictors of restorative therapy effects after stroke.

Authors:  Erin Burke; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Reliability of TMS metrics in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K A Potter-Baker; D P Janini; F S Frost; P Chabra; N Varnerin; D A Cunningham; V Sankarasubramanian; E B Plow
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.