RATIONALE: To study the relationship between emphysema and/or airflow obstruction and lung cancer in a high-risk population. OBJECTIVE: We studied lung cancer related to radiographic emphysema and spirometric airflow obstruction in tobacco-exposed persons who were screened for lung cancer using chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Subjects completed questionnaires, spirometry, and low-dose helical chest CT. CT scans were scored for emphysema based on National Emphysema Treatment Trial criteria. Multiple logistic regressions estimated the independent associations between various factors, including radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction, and subsequent lung cancer diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 3,638 subjects, 57.5, 18.8, 14.6, and 9.1% had no, trace, mild, and moderate-severe emphysema, and 57.3, 13.6, 22.8, and 6.4% had no, mild (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] I), moderate (GOLD II), and severe (GOLD III-IV) airflow obstruction. Of 3,638 subjects, 99 (2.7%) received a lung cancer diagnosis. Adjusting for sex, age, years of cigarette smoking, and number of cigarettes smoked daily, logistic regression showed the expected lung cancer association with the presence of airflow obstruction (GOLD I-IV, odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-3.27). A second logistic regression showed lung cancer related to emphysema (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.21-5.73). After additional adjustments for GOLD class, emphysema remained a strong and statistically significant factor related to lung cancer (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.91-5.15). CONCLUSIONS: Emphysema on CT scan and airflow obstruction on spirometry are related to lung cancer in a high-risk population. Emphysema is independently related to lung cancer. Both radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction should be considered when assessing lung cancer risk.
RATIONALE: To study the relationship between emphysema and/or airflow obstruction and lung cancer in a high-risk population. OBJECTIVE: We studied lung cancer related to radiographic emphysema and spirometric airflow obstruction in tobacco-exposed persons who were screened for lung cancer using chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Subjects completed questionnaires, spirometry, and low-dose helical chest CT. CT scans were scored for emphysema based on National Emphysema Treatment Trial criteria. Multiple logistic regressions estimated the independent associations between various factors, including radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction, and subsequent lung cancer diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 3,638 subjects, 57.5, 18.8, 14.6, and 9.1% had no, trace, mild, and moderate-severe emphysema, and 57.3, 13.6, 22.8, and 6.4% had no, mild (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] I), moderate (GOLD II), and severe (GOLD III-IV) airflow obstruction. Of 3,638 subjects, 99 (2.7%) received a lung cancer diagnosis. Adjusting for sex, age, years of cigarette smoking, and number of cigarettes smoked daily, logistic regression showed the expected lung cancer association with the presence of airflow obstruction (GOLD I-IV, odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-3.27). A second logistic regression showed lung cancer related to emphysema (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.21-5.73). After additional adjustments for GOLD class, emphysema remained a strong and statistically significant factor related to lung cancer (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.91-5.15). CONCLUSIONS:Emphysema on CT scan and airflow obstruction on spirometry are related to lung cancer in a high-risk population. Emphysema is independently related to lung cancer. Both radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction should be considered when assessing lung cancer risk.
Authors: James C Hogg; Fanny Chu; Soraya Utokaparch; Ryan Woods; W Mark Elliott; Liliana Buzatu; Ruben M Cherniack; Robert M Rogers; Frank C Sciurba; Harvey O Coxson; Peter D Paré Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew R Gingo; Mehdi Nouraie; Cathy J Kessinger; Ruth M Greenblatt; Laurence Huang; Eric C Kleerup; Lawrence Kingsley; Deborah K McMahon; Alison Morris Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2018-02
Authors: Pablo Sanchez-Salcedo; David O Wilson; Juan P de-Torres; Joel L Weissfeld; Juan Berto; Arantzazu Campo; Ana B Alcaide; Jesús Pueyo; Gorka Bastarrika; Luis M Seijo; Maria J Pajares; Ruben Pio; Luis M Montuenga; Javier J Zulueta Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Mathilde M Winkler Wille; Sarah J van Riel; Zaigham Saghir; Asger Dirksen; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Colin Jacobs; Laura Hohwü Thomsen; Ernst Th Scholten; Lene T Skovgaard; Bram van Ginneken Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Ishijima; H Nakayama; T Itonaga; Y Tajima; S Shiraishi; M Okubo; R Mikami; K Tokuuye Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Gaetan Deslee; Tracy L Adair-Kirk; Tomoko Betsuyaku; Jason C Woods; Carla H Moore; David S Gierada; Susan H Conradi; Jeffrey J Atkinson; Holly M Toennies; John T Battaile; Dale K Kobayashi; G Alexander Patterson; Michael J Holtzman; Richard A Pierce Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Antonio Gutierrez; Robert Suh; Fereidoun Abtin; Scott Genshaft; Kathleen Brown Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 1.513