Literature DB >> 15672278

Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions.

Tillmann Loch1, Ursula Eppelmann, Jan Lehmann, Bernd Wullich, Annemie Loch, Michael Stöckle.   

Abstract

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided multiple systematic random biopsies are presently the method of choice for determining the presence or absence of prostate cancer. TRUS image information is only used to guide the biopsy needle into the prostate, but not to localize and target cancerous lesions. Our aim in this study was to evaluated the possible predictive value of tumor suspicious endosonographic lesions of the prostate for prostate biopsies. We prospectively compared six systematic biopsies with lesion guided biopsies in a consecutive series of 217 patients. All patients had a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level of >4 ng/ml without a history of prostate disease. In a subgroup of 145 men with sonomorphologic lesions suggestive for prostate cancer (hypoechoic areas or asymmetries predominantly in the peripheral zone), lesion-guided biopsies were taken in addition to the systematic biopsies. We evaluated the number of tumors which were diagnosed or missed by both of the biopsy strategies. Of the 217 evaluated patients, 64 (29%) had histology confirmed cancer. Four patients with negative sextant biopsies had a positive TRUS guided biopsy. Out of 145 patients with a normal TRUS, three were cancer positive by sextant biopsy. A total of 1,387 individual biopsy cores were evaluated. Of the 1,304 systematic biopsy cores, 182 (14%) were positive and 1,122 (86%) negative. Of the 329 TRUS lesion guided biopsy cores 139 (42%) were positive and 190 (58%) negative. Patients with tumor suggestive TRUS lesions have a considerably higher risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer compared to patients without such lesions. Both systematic sextant and TRUS lesion guided biopsies missed detectable prostate cancer in a minority of patients. Taking the endosonographic morphology of the prostate gland into consideration for biopsy strategies may improve the quality of the biopsy and avoid unnecessary invasive procedures in selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15672278     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-004-0462-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  13 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of ten systematic TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.

Authors:  V Ravery; T Billebaud; M Toublanc; L Boccon-Gibod; J F Hermieu; F Moulinier; E Blanc; V Delmas; L Boccon-Gibod
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Efficacy of transrectal ultrasound for identification of clinically undetected prostate cancer.

Authors:  M K Terris; F S Freiha; J E McNeal; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer.

Authors:  M Norberg; L Egevad; L Holmberg; P Sparén; B J Norlén; C Busch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases.

Authors:  Neil Fleshner; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A L Potosky; B A Miller; P C Albertsen; B S Kramer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Saturation prostate biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office.

Authors:  J Stephen Jones; Mehmet Oder; Craig D Zippe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pathologic basis of the sonographic appearance of the normal and malignant prostate.

Authors:  K Shinohara; P T Scardino; S S Carter; T M Wheeler
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.241

8.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The significance of isoechoic prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  W J Ellis; M K Brawer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Extended and saturation needle biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kristin L Chrouser; Michael M Lieber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.862

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  [Prostate biopsy: Procedure in the clinical routine].

Authors:  T Enzmann; T Tokas; K Korte; M Ritter; P Hammerer; L Franzaring; H Heynemann; H-W Gottfried; H Bertermann; M Meyer-Schwickerath; B Wirth; A Pelzer; T Loch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Innovative imaging in urology: fascination and future. Yesterday, today, and tomorrow].

Authors:  T Loch; G Schneider
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Urologic imaging for localized prostate cancer in 2007.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Standards, innovations, and controversies in urologic imaging.

Authors:  Pat Fox Fulgham; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Internal Fusion: exact correlation of transrectal ultrasound images of the prostate by detailed landmarks over time for targeted biopsies or follow-up.

Authors:  Yanqi Xie; Theodoros Tokas; Björn Grabski; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The Clinical Value of Performing an MRI before Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Myung Sun Choi; Yong Sun Choi; Byung Il Yoon; Su Jin Kim; Hyuk Jin Cho; Sung Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Tae-Kon Hwang; Sae Woong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-08-22

7.  Prostate cancer diagnostics: innovative imaging in case of multiple negative biopsies.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [Innovative approaches in prostate cancer ultrasound].

Authors:  T Loch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  [Transrectal sonography biofeedback training (TSB). Incontinence training after radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  W Vahlensieck
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Transrectal contrast enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M H Wink; J J M C H de la Rosette; C A Grimbergen; H Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.