Literature DB >> 21927706

The Clinical Value of Performing an MRI before Prostate Biopsy.

Myung Sun Choi1, Yong Sun Choi, Byung Il Yoon, Su Jin Kim, Hyuk Jin Cho, Sung Hoo Hong, Ji Youl Lee, Tae-Kon Hwang, Sae Woong Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer foci have a characteristic feature in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We aimed to assess the clinical value of MRI before prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2009 to June 2010, 154 patients were enrolled in this study. A total of 51 patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer underwent prostate MRI by a 3T scanner before transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies. A total of 103 patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer underwent prostate MRI after biopsies. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were evaluated. In addition, tumor location of pathologic findings and ADC mapping on MRI were matched and compared.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of MRI before and after biopsy was 84.8% and 92.4%, respectively. The PPV of MRI before and after biopsy was 75.7% and 92.4%, respectively. The MRI location match percentage before and after biopsy was 89.3% and 94.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other previous reports, our results show that the prostate cancer detection sensitivity of MRI is on the rise. Furthermore, MRI before prostate biopsy can provide more information by which to identify prostate cancer during prostate biopsy and thus reduce the false-negative rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; MRI; Prostate cancer

Year:  2011        PMID: 21927706      PMCID: PMC3162225          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.8.572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


  30 in total

1.  Leveling of prostate cancer mortality in Western Europe.

Authors:  Fabio Levi; Franca Lucchini; Eva Negri; Peter Boyle; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  W J Catalona; A W Partin; K M Slawin; M K Brawer; R C Flanigan; A Patel; J P Richie; J B deKernion; P C Walsh; P T Scardino; P H Lange; E N Subong; R E Parson; G H Gasior; K G Loveland; P C Southwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Reduction of prostate cancer mortality in Tyrol, Austria, after introduction of prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Willi Oberaigner; Wolfgang Horninger; Helmut Klocker; Dieter Schönitzer; Wolf Stühlinger; Georg Bartsch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  Interpretation of free prostate specific antigen clinical research studies for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  D L Woodrum; M K Brawer; A W Partin; W J Catalona; P C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch; Ursula Eppelmann; Jan Lehmann; Bernd Wullich; Annemie Loch; Michael Stöckle
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level: role of endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Nick G Costouros; Fergus V Coakley; Antonio C Westphalen; Aliya Qayyum; Benjamin M Yeh; Bonnie N Joe; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Transition zone and anterior stromal prostate cancers: zone of origin and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology.

Authors:  Sébastien Bouyé; Eric Potiron; Philippe Puech; Xavier Leroy; Laurent Lemaitre; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 8.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Steven A Leibel; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Evaluation of the potential of diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  V A Morgan; S Kyriazi; S E Ashley; N M DeSouza
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging.

Authors:  M D Schnall; Y Imai; J Tomaszewski; H M Pollack; R E Lenkinski; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Comparison of bi- and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to select men for active surveillance.

Authors:  Karen-Cecilie D Thestrup; Vibeke Løgager; Lars Boesen; Henrik S Thomsen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2019-07-31

Review 3.  Paradigm Shift in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Pre-Biopsy Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy.

Authors:  Jung Jae Park; Chan Kyo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 7.109

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.