Literature DB >> 18259724

[Balance of required dose and image quality in digital radiography].

M Uffmann1, C Schaefer-Prokop, U Neitzel.   

Abstract

Projection radiography is in an advanced stage of progressive transition from conventional screen-film imaging to digital image acquisition modalities. The radiographic technique, including examination parameters such as tube voltage, tube current and filtration has frequently been adopted from screen-film technology. Digital systems, however, are characterized by their flexibility as the dose can be reduced at the expense of image quality and vice versa. The imaging parameters need to be individually optimized according to the best performance of a system. The traditional means of dose adjustment, such as positioning and collimation, are as valid for digital techniques as they were for conventional techniques. Digital techniques increasingly offer options for dose reduction. At the same time there is a risk to accidentally substantially increase patient dose due to the lack of visual control. Therefore, the implementation of dose indicators and dose monitoring is mandatory for digital radiography. The use of image quality classes according to the dose requirements of given clinical indications are a further step towards modern radiation protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18259724     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-008-1617-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  19 in total

1.  [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].

Authors:  R Fasbender; R Schaetzing
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Chest radiography: optimization of X-ray spectrum for cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Ehsan Samei; Harrell G Chotas; Richard J Warp; Alan H Baydush; Carey E Floyd; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Tradeoffs between image quality and dose.

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10

4.  The current concept of speed should not be used to describe digital imaging systems.

Authors:  Walter Huda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Influence of cassette type on the DQE of CR systems.

Authors:  P Monnin; Z Holzer; R Wolf; U Neitzel; P Vock; F Gudinchet; F R Verdun
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Computed radiography: a higher dose?

Authors:  Charles E Willis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-08-28

7.  Towards image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic radiography.

Authors:  J H Launders; A R Cowen; R F Bury; P Hawkridge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Comparison of doses for bedside examinations of the chest with conventional screen-film and computed radiography: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G C Weatherburn; S Bryan; J G Davies
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Okka W Hamer; Markus Völk; Niels Zorger; Ingitha Borisch; Roland Büttner; Stefan Feuerbach; Michael Strotzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  [Occupational exposure to radiation].

Authors:  R Loose; M Wucherer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.635

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography: a contradiction?].

Authors:  S Pötter-Lang; M Dünkelmeyer; M Uffmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.