Literature DB >> 15669143

Boundaries between chromosomal domains of X inactivation and escape bind CTCF and lack CpG methylation during early development.

Galina N Filippova1, Mimi K Cheng, James M Moore, Jean-Pierre Truong, Ying J Hu, Di Kim Nguyen, Karen D Tsuchiya, Christine M Disteche.   

Abstract

Escape from X inactivation results in expression of genes embedded within inactive chromatin, suggesting the existence of boundary elements between domains. We report that the 5' end of Jarid1c, a mouse escape gene adjacent to an inactivated gene, binds CTCF, displays high levels of histone H3 acetylation, and functions as a CTCF-dependent chromatin insulator. CpG island methylation at Jarid1c was very low during development and virtually absent at the CTCF sites, signifying that CTCF may influence DNA methylation and chromatin modifications. CTCF binding sites were also present at the 5' end of two other escape genes, mouse Eif2s3x and human EIF2S3, each adjacent to an inactivated gene, but not at genes embedded within large escape domains. Thus, CTCF was specifically bound to transition regions, suggesting a role in maintaining both X inactivation and escape domains. Furthermore, the evolution of X chromosome domains appears to be associated with repositioning of chromatin boundary elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15669143     DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cell        ISSN: 1534-5807            Impact factor:   12.270


  108 in total

Review 1.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  The complex transcription regulatory landscape of our genome: control in three dimensions.

Authors:  Erik Splinter; Wouter de Laat
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Identification and characterization of putative methylation targets in the MAOA locus using bioinformatic approaches.

Authors:  Elena Shumay; Joanna S Fowler
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 4.  Nuclear organization and dosage compensation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Chow; Edith Heard
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  A DNA insulator prevents repression of a targeted X-linked transgene but not its random or imprinted X inactivation.

Authors:  Dominic Ciavatta; Sundeep Kalantry; Terry Magnuson; Oliver Smithies
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  macroH2A1 histone variants are depleted on active genes but concentrated on the inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  Lakshmi N Changolkar; John R Pehrson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced.

Authors:  Julie Chaumeil; Patricia Le Baccon; Anton Wutz; Edith Heard
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Tsix-mediated epigenetic switch of a CTCF-flanked region of the Xist promoter determines the Xist transcription program.

Authors:  Pablo Navarro; Damian R Page; Philip Avner; Claire Rougeulle
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Escape from X chromosome inactivation is an intrinsic property of the Jarid1c locus.

Authors:  Nan Li; Laura Carrel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Protection against telomeric position effects by the chicken cHS4 beta-globin insulator.

Authors:  Héctor Rincón-Arano; Mayra Furlan-Magaril; Félix Recillas-Targa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.