Literature DB >> 15667761

Impact of UK colorectal cancer screening pilot on primary care.

Ruth Jepson1, David Weller, Freda Alexander, Jeremy Walker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot has recently been completed to evaluate the feasibility of screening using the faecal occult blood test. Screening will be phased in over the next several years, and it is important to consider the impact on the NHS workforce. AIM: To determine the impact of the UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot on primary care workload. DESIGN OF STUDY: A retrospective survey and prospective audit of general practice staff.
SETTING: General practice.
METHOD: Workload impact was assessed using a postal questionnaire and a prospective audit of activity in participating practices. Questionnaires were sent to practices that had been involved in the Pilot between 6 weeks and 1 year previously. They were sent to a random sample of 59 practices in Scotland and 60 practices in England between February 2001 and March 2002. Audit forms were sent prospectively to 60 practices involved in the Pilot between May 2001 and September 2002.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven per cent of GPs, 82% of practice managers, 69% of practice nurses, and 70% of receptionists responded to the questionnaire. Of 60 practices contacted to take part in the workload audit, 38 returned completed 'workload impact audit' forms. Most practice staff indicated they spent 2% or less of their time during the screening period on Pilot-related activities. Forty per cent of GPs thought that a national colorectal cancer screening programme would substantially impact on the workload in primary care. However, there were variations by country: practice staff in Scotland were more likely to think that it would substantially impact on workload than practice staff in England (44.7% versus 26.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: The surveys and audit demonstrate that the Pilot has had a discernible, albeit modest, impact on workload in primary care. Workload of particular significance to primary care personnel includes increases in paperwork, administration, and information provision to patients. The majority of primary care staff support the introduction of a colorectal cancer screening programme. However, there is a strong perception, particularly among GPs, that a national programme of faecal occult blood test screening will impact significantly on workload in primary care, and that primary care-based activities generated through screening should be adequately resourced and remunerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15667761      PMCID: PMC1266238     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  12 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening in the UK: Joint Position Statement by the British Society of Gastroenterology, The Royal College of Physicians, and The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Rhodes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Cervical cancer screening in England.

Authors:  J Patnick
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; S Moss; F Sufi; C M Mangham; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner.

Authors:  S R Cole; G P Young; D Byrne; J R Guy; J Morcom
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds.

Authors:  O D Jørgensen; O Kronborg; C Fenger
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; O D Jørgensen; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult.

Authors:  B Towler; L Irwig; P Glasziou; J Kewenter; D Weller; C Silagy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-29

9.  A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman; C P Quesenberry; N S Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Routine breast screening for women aged 65-69: results from evaluation of the demonstration sites.

Authors:  S M Moss; J Brown; L Garvican; D A Coleman; L E Johns; R G Blanks; G Rubin; J Oswald; A Page; A Evans; P Gamble; R Wilson; L Lee; J Liston; L Sturdy; G Sutton; G Wardman; J Patnick; R Winder
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-11-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening coverage in Greece. PACMeR 02.01 study collaboration.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kamposioras; Davide Mauri; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Georgios Ferentinos; Georgios Zacharias; Apostolos Xilomenos; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Magdalini Bristianou; Dimitra Chasioti; Athanasios Milousis; Angeliki Vittoraki; Georgios Koukourakis; Ioanna Chatziioannou; Panagiotis Papadopoulos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Colorectal cancer in primary care.

Authors:  David Weller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-08

3.  The impact of computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and perceived usability and acceptability on the efficacy of a decision support tool for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Katrina Lindblom; Tess Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Ingrid H K Flight; Ian Zajac
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Colorectal cancer screening using the faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a survey of GP attitudes and practices in the UK.

Authors:  Sarah Damery; Sue Clifford; Sue Wilson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Improving survival in colorectal cancer: what role for general practice?

Authors:  Greg Rubin; David Weller
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tess A Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Stephen R Cole; Graeme Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Colorectal cancer screening awareness among physicians in Greece.

Authors:  Apostolos Xilomenos; Davide Mauri; Konstantinos Kamposioras; Athanasia Gkinosati; Georgios Zacharias; Varvara Sidiropoulou; Panagiotis Papadopoulos; Georgios Chatzimichalis; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Christina Peponi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Bowel cancer screening in England: a qualitative study of GPs' attitudes and information needs.

Authors:  Chris Woodrow; Linda Rozmovits; Paul Hewitson; Peter Rose; Joan Austoker; Eila Watson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.