Literature DB >> 11720462

Routine breast screening for women aged 65-69: results from evaluation of the demonstration sites.

S M Moss1, J Brown, L Garvican, D A Coleman, L E Johns, R G Blanks, G Rubin, J Oswald, A Page, A Evans, P Gamble, R Wilson, L Lee, J Liston, L Sturdy, G Sutton, G Wardman, J Patnick, R Winder.   

Abstract

Routine programme data and specially designed surveys from 3 demonstration sites were analysed to determine the implications of extending the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP), to include routine invitations for women up to 69 years. All women aged 65-69 and registered with GPs in these areas received routine invitations for breast screening along with those aged 50-64. Overall uptake was 71% in women aged 65-69 compared with 78% in younger women, but was > or = 90% in both groups who had previously attended within 5 years. Recall rates were lower for older women, but with a higher positive predictive value for cancer. The percentages of invasive cancer in different prognostic categories were similar in the 2 age groups. Older women took no longer to screen than younger women. The costs per woman invited or per woman screened were also similar to those for women aged 50-64, whilst the cost per cancer detected was some 34% lower in older women. Breast screening is as cost effective for women aged 65-69 as for those aged 50-64, with a higher cancer detection rate balancing shorter life expectancy. The proposed extension to the national programme will have considerable workforce implications for the NHSBSP and require additional resources. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11720462      PMCID: PMC2375256          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  10 in total

1.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Galea; R W Blamey; C E Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Generalizing costs from trials. Analyzing center selection bias in a breast screening trial.

Authors:  K Johnston; K Gerard; J Brown
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Routine invitation of women aged 65-69 for breast cancer screening: results of first year of pilot study.

Authors:  G Rubin; L Garvican; S Moss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

4.  Response of women aged 65-74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK.

Authors:  D Horton Taylor; K McPherson; S Parbhoo; N Perry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  J Fracheboud; H J de Koning; P M Beemsterboer; R Boer; J H Hendriks; A L Verbeek; B M van Ineveld; A E de Bruyn; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1998-03-02       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study.

Authors:  P Hobbs; C Kay; E H Friedman; A S St Leger; C Lambert; C R Boggis; T M Howard; A W Owen; D L Asbury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-12-08

7.  Effect of issuing an invitation for breast cancer screening to women aged 65 to 69.

Authors:  P J Hendry; C Entwistle
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  S Shapiro; E A Coleman; M Broeders; M Codd; H de Koning; J Fracheboud; S Moss; E Paci; S Stachenko; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Effect of breast cancer screening after age 65.

Authors:  H H Chen; L Tabar; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme.

Authors:  J van Dijck; A Verbeek; J Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Impact of UK colorectal cancer screening pilot on primary care.

Authors:  Ruth Jepson; David Weller; Freda Alexander; Jeremy Walker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Mottram; Wendy Lynn Knerr; Daniel Gallacher; Hannah Fraser; Lena Al-Khudairy; Abimbola Ayorinde; Sian Williamson; Chidozie Nduka; Olalekan A Uthman; Samantha Johnson; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Christopher Stinton; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evaluation of extension of breast screening to women aged 65-70 in England using screening performance measures.

Authors:  R L Bennett; R G Blanks; S M Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.