Literature DB >> 21857024

The impact of computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and perceived usability and acceptability on the efficacy of a decision support tool for colorectal cancer screening.

Katrina Lindblom1, Tess Gregory, Carlene Wilson, Ingrid H K Flight, Ian Zajac.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the efficacy of an internet-based personalized decision support (PDS) tool designed to aid in the decision to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) using a fecal occult blood test. We tested whether the efficacy of the tool in influencing attitudes to screening was mediated by perceived usability and acceptability, and considered the role of computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety in these relationships.
METHODS: Eighty-one participants aged 50-76 years worked through the on-line PDS tool and completed questionnaires on computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes to and beliefs about CRC screening before and after exposure to the PDS, and perceived usability and acceptability of the tool.
RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA found that PDS exposure led to a significant increase in knowledge about CRC and screening, and more positive attitudes to CRC screening as measured by factors from the Preventive Health Model. Perceived usability and acceptability of the PDS mediated changes in attitudes toward CRC screening (but not CRC knowledge), and computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety were significant predictors of individuals' perceptions of the tool.
CONCLUSION: Interventions designed to decrease computer anxiety, such as computer courses and internet training, may improve the acceptability of new health information technologies including internet-based decision support tools, increasing their impact on behavior change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21857024      PMCID: PMC3341777          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  14 in total

1.  Acceptability and feasibility of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention using stages of change: project FAITH.

Authors:  Corneel Vandelanotte; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2003-06

2.  Impact of UK colorectal cancer screening pilot on primary care.

Authors:  Ruth Jepson; David Weller; Freda Alexander; Jeremy Walker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Cross-cultural validation of the preventive health model for colorectal cancer screening: an Australian study.

Authors:  Ingrid H Flight; Carlene J Wilson; Jane McGillivray; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2010-10

4.  The current and future role of the Internet in patient education.

Authors:  B Richards; A W Colman; R A Hollingsworth
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 5.  Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas L Webb; Judith Joseph; Lucy Yardley; Susan Michie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Protocol for population testing of an Internet-based Personalised Decision Support system for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Carlene J Wilson; Ingrid H K Flight; Ian T Zajac; Deborah Turnbull; Graeme P Young; Stephen R Cole; Tess Gregory
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R E Myers; E Ross; C Jepson; T Wolf; A Balshem; L Millner; H Leventhal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Intention to be screened over time for colorectal cancer in male automotive workers.

Authors:  Beatty G Watts; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Carol L Bennett; Dawn Stacey; Michael Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Vikki A Entwistle; Valerie Fiset; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sara Khangura; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; David Rovner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 10.  The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes.

Authors:  Dean J Wantland; Carmen J Portillo; William L Holzemer; Rob Slaughter; Eva M McGhee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  11 in total

1.  Digital Solutions for Informed Decision Making: An Academic-Community Partnership for the Development of a Prostate Cancer Decision Aid for African American Men.

Authors:  Otis L Owens; Daniela B Friedman; Heather M Brandt; Jay M Bernhardt; James R Hébert
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-01-06

Review 2.  Personalization and Patient Involvement in Decision Support Systems: Current Trends.

Authors:  S Quaglini; L Sacchi; G Lanzola; N Viani
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Patients Decision Aid System Based on FHIR Profiles.

Authors:  Ilia Semenov; Georgy Kopanitsa; Dmitry Denisov; Yakovenko Alexandr; Roman Osenev; Yury Andreychuk
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  What to Build for Middle-Agers to Come? Attractive and Necessary Functions of Exercise-Promotion Mobile Phone Apps: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Gen-Yih Liao; Yu-Tai Chien; Yu-Jen Chen; Hsiao-Fang Hsiung; Hsiao-Jung Chen; Meng-Hua Hsieh; Wen-Jie Wu
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Web-Based Communication Strategies Designed to Improve Intention to Minimize Risk for Colorectal Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carlene Wilson; Ingrid Flight; Ian T Zajac; Deborah Turnbull; Graeme P Young; Ian Olver
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2018-02-12

6.  Knowledge, attitudes, and worries among different health literacy groups before receiving first invitation to colorectal cancer screening: Cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Pernille Gabel; Mette Bach Larsen; Adrian Edwards; Pia Kirkegaard; Berit Andersen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-04-25

7.  Decision Support and the Effectiveness of Web-based Delivery and Information Tailoring for Bowel Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Ingrid H Flight; Carlene J Wilson; Ian T Zajac; Elizabeth Hart; Jane A McGillivray
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2012-09-26

Review 8.  Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Ania Syrowatka; Dörthe Krömker; Ari N Meguerditchian; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pernille Gabel; Mette Bach Larsen; Pia Kirkegaard; Adrian Edwards; Berit Andersen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Developing a Self-Administered Decision Aid for Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tailored to Citizens With Lower Educational Attainment: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Pernille Gabel; Pia Kirkegaard; Mette Bach Larsen; Adrian Edwards; Berit Andersen
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2018-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.