Literature DB >> 9468466

Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

W E Evans1, M V Relling, J H Rodman, W R Crom, J M Boyett, C H Pui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of clearance of antileukemic agents differs by a factor of 3 to 10 among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We hypothesized that the outcome of treatment would be improved if doses were individualized to prevent low systemic exposure to the drugs in patients with fast drug clearance.
METHODS: We stratified and randomly assigned 182 children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia to postremission regimens that included high-dose methotrexate and teniposide plus cytarabine. The doses of these drugs were based on body-surface area (in the conventional-therapy group) or the rates of clearance of the three medications in each patient (in the individualized-treatment group). In the individualized-treatment group, doses were increased in patients with rapid clearance and decreased in patients with very slow clearance.
RESULTS: Patients who received individualized doses had significantly fewer courses of treatment with systemic exposures below the target range than did patients who received conventional doses (P<0.001 for each medication). Among the patients with B-lineage leukemia, those who received individualized therapy had a significantly better outcome than those given conventional therapy (P=0.02); the mean (+/-SE) rates of continuous complete remission at five years were 76+/-6 percent and 66+/-7 percent, respectively. There was no significant difference between treatments for patients with T-lineage leukemia (P=0.54). In a proportional-hazards model, the time-dependent systemic exposure to methotrexate, but not to teniposide or cytarabine, was significantly related to the risk of early relapse in children with B-lineage leukemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting the dose of methotrexate to account for the patient's ability to clear the drug can improve the outcome in children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9468466     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199802193380803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  106 in total

1.  Target concentration intervention: beyond Y2K.

Authors:  N H Holford
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Therapeutic trials in childhood ALL: what's their future?

Authors:  O B Eden
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Concentration-controlled or effect-controlled trials: useful alternatives to conventional dose-controlled trials?

Authors:  A Grahnén; M O Karlsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Quantitative MRI assessment of leukoencephalopathy.

Authors:  Wilburn E Reddick; John O Glass; James W Langston; Kathleen J Helton
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Chemotherapy of childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia: the first 50 years.

Authors:  J Lilleyman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.022

7.  Rare versus common variants in pharmacogenetics: SLCO1B1 variation and methotrexate disposition.

Authors:  Laura B Ramsey; Gitte H Bruun; Wenjian Yang; Lisa R Treviño; Selina Vattathil; Paul Scheet; Cheng Cheng; Gary L Rosner; Kathleen M Giacomini; Yiping Fan; Alex Sparreboom; Torben S Mikkelsen; Thomas J Corydon; Ching-Hon Pui; William E Evans; Mary V Relling
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Real-time, aptamer-based tracking of circulating therapeutic agents in living animals.

Authors:  Brian Scott Ferguson; David A Hoggarth; Dan Maliniak; Kyle Ploense; Ryan J White; Nick Woodward; Kuangwen Hsieh; Andrew J Bonham; Michael Eisenstein; Tod E Kippin; Kevin W Plaxco; Hyongsok Tom Soh
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of chemotherapeutic effects: application of a transit compartment model to characterize methotrexate effects in vitro.

Authors:  Evelyn D Lobo; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  AAPS PharmSci       Date:  2002

Review 10.  A new frontier in haematology - combining pharmacokinetic with pharmacodynamic factors to improve choice and dose of drug.

Authors:  David Rey Arpon; Maher K Gandhi; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.