Literature DB >> 1565289

Nutrition and health communication: the message and the media over half a century.

J P Goldberg1.   

Abstract

The diet-health message for the 1990s has become complex, changing from the simple directives of previous decades as scientific evidence has evolved. If today's consumers are more knowledgeable, they are also more confused. The confusion stems not only from the complexity of the message, but also from the fact that the various groups and organizations developing it respond to the challenge from their own perspectives. Added to this are the constraints of the various media (print, radio, and television) that deliver the message. For consumers, the result has been not only confusion but, at times, outright rejection of resonable recommendations. The more that health professionals in academia, government, and voluntary organizations, food producers, and health reporters can agree on a set of clear, consistent, focused, and positive messages based on current scientific knowledge, the sooner recommendations for a healthful diet will be accepted and followed.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1565289     DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1992.tb01272.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Rev        ISSN: 0029-6643            Impact factor:   7.110


  10 in total

1.  Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-10

2.  Development of a new simple estimating method for protein, fat, and carbohydrate in cooked foods.

Authors:  T Kumae
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Overcoming consumer inertia to dietary guidance.

Authors:  Densie Webb; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Is "processed" a four-letter word? The role of processed foods in achieving dietary guidelines and nutrient recommendations.

Authors:  Johanna T Dwyer; Victor L Fulgoni; Roger A Clemens; David B Schmidt; Marjorie R Freedman
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-10-11

6.  Health behavior change: can genomics improve behavioral adherence?

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Angela D Bryan; Molly S Bray; Gary E Swan; Eric D Green
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Measuring Media Exposure to Contradictory Health Information: A Comparative Analysis of Four Potential Measures.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2012-03-02

8.  'Language is the source of misunderstandings'--impact of terminology on public perceptions of health promotion messages.

Authors:  Christina H Buckton; Michael E J Lean; Emilie Combet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Quality assessment of nutrition coverage in the media: a 6-week survey of five popular UK newspapers.

Authors:  Alice R Kininmonth; Nafeesa Jamil; Nasser Almatrouk; Charlotte E L Evans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Nutrition communication - Rhetoric & reality.

Authors:  SubbaRao M Gavaravarapu
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.375

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.