Literature DB >> 18305932

Ultra-high field parallel imaging of the superior parietal lobule during mental maze solving.

Trenton A Jerde1, Scott M Lewis, Ute Goerke, Pavlos Gourtzelidis, Charidimos Tzagarakis, Joshua Lynch, Steen Moeller, Pierre-François Van de Moortele, Gregor Adriany, Jeran Trangle, Kâmil Uğurbil, Apostolos P Georgopoulos.   

Abstract

We used ultra-high field (7 T) fMRI and parallel imaging to scan the superior parietal lobule (SPL) of human subjects as they mentally traversed a maze path in one of four directions (up, down, left, right). A counterbalanced design for maze presentation and a quasi-isotropic voxel (1.46 x 1.46 x 2 mm thick) collection were implemented. Fifty-one percent of single voxels in the SPL were tuned to the direction of the maze path. Tuned voxels were distributed throughout the SPL, bilaterally. A nearest neighbor analysis revealed a "honeycomb" arrangement such that voxels tuned to a particular direction tended to occur in clusters. Three-dimensional (3D) directional clusters were identified in SPL as oriented centroids traversing the cortical depth. There were 13 same-direction clusters per hemisphere containing 22 voxels per cluster, on the average; the mean nearest-neighbor, same-direction intercluster distance was 9.4 mm. These results provide a much finer detail of the directional tuning in SPL, as compared to those obtained previously at 4 T (Gourtzelidis et al. Exp Brain Res 165:273-282, 2005). The more accurate estimates of quantitative clustering parameters in 3D brain space in this study were made possible by the higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios afforded by the higher magnetic field of 7 T as well as the quasi-isotropic design of voxel data collection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18305932      PMCID: PMC4021722          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1318-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  72 in total

1.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; A Kastrup; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Imaging brain function in humans at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  E Yacoub; A Shmuel; J Pfeuffer; P F Van De Moortele; G Adriany; P Andersen; J T Vaughan; H Merkle; K Ugurbil; X Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Functional specificity of superior parietal mediation of spatial shifting.

Authors:  R Vandenberghe; D R Gitelman; T B Parrish; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A new statistical approach to detecting significant activation in functional MRI.

Authors:  J L Marchini; B D Ripley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  EPI-BOLD fMRI of human motor cortex at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: sensitivity dependence on echo time and acquisition bandwidth.

Authors:  Francesco Fera; Martin N Yongbi; Peter van Gelderen; Joseph A Frank; Venkata S Mattay; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Frontiers of brain mapping using MRI.

Authors:  Noam Harel; Kâmil Uğurbil; Kâmil Uludağ; Essa Yacoub
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI.

Authors:  R Turner; P Jezzard; H Wen; K K Kwong; D Le Bihan; T Zeffiro; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Identification of vascular structures as a major source of signal contrast in high resolution 2D and 3D functional activation imaging of the motor cortex at 1.5T: preliminary results.

Authors:  S Lai; A L Hopkins; E M Haacke; D Li; B A Wasserman; P Buckley; L Friedman; H Meltzer; P Hedera; R Friedland
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Impact of path parameters on maze solution time.

Authors:  M V Chafee; B B Averbeck; D A Crowe; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Arch Ital Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.000

View more
  9 in total

1.  Perception and action selection dissociate human ventral and dorsal cortex.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Trenton A Jerde; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  What is feasible with imaging human brain function and connectivity using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Development of functional imaging in the human brain (fMRI); the University of Minnesota experience.

Authors:  Kâmil Uğurbil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The search for the neural mechanisms of the set size effect.

Authors:  Trenton A Jerde; Akiko Ikkai; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Encoding and decoding in fMRI.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Kendrick N Kay; Shinji Nishimoto; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Bilateral parietal contributions to spatial language.

Authors:  Julie Conder; Julius Fridriksson; Gordon C Baylis; Cameron M Smith; Timothy W Boiteau; Amit Almor
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 7.  Maps of space in human frontoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Trenton A Jerde; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2013-04-18

Review 8.  Contributions of cortical feedback to sensory processing in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Lucy S Petro; Luca Vizioli; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 9.  How good is the macaque monkey model of the human brain?

Authors:  Richard Passingham
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 6.627

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.