Literature DB >> 19293113

The effects of individual differences and task difficulty on inattentional blindness.

Daniel J Simons1, Melinda S Jensen.   

Abstract

Most studies of inattentional blindness-the failure to notice an unexpected object when attention is focused elsewhere-have focused on one critical trial. For that trial, noticing the unexpected object might be a result of random variability, so that any given individual would be equally likely to notice the unexpected object. On the other hand, individual differences in the ability to perform the primary task might make noticing more likely for some individuals than for others. Increasing the difficulty of the primary task has been shown to decrease noticing rates for both brief static displays (Cartwright-Finch & Lavie, 2007) and dynamic monitoring tasks (Simons & Chabris, 1999). However, those studies did not explore whether individual differences in noticing arise from differences in the ability to perform the primary task. For our Experiment 1, we used a staircase procedure to equate primary task performance across individuals in a dynamic inattentional blindness task and found that the demands of the primary task affected noticing rates when individual differences in accuracy were minimized. In Experiment 2, we found that individual differences in primary task performance did not predict noticing of an unexpected object. Together, these findings suggest that although the demands of the primary task do affect inattentional blindness rates, individual differences in the ability to meet those demands do not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19293113     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Ula Cartwright-Finch; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-02-14

2.  The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Daniel Memmert
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2006-02-17

Review 3.  Towards a science of magic.

Authors:  Gustav Kuhn; Alym A Amlani; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Attention and awareness in stage magic: turning tricks into research.

Authors:  Stephen L Macknik; Mac King; James Randi; Apollo Robbins; John Thompson; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Visual Attentional Orienting in Developing Hockey Players

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1997-02

6.  A "bright zone" in male hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) eyes and associated faster motion detection and increased contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Andrew D Straw; Eric J Warrant; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Profiles in patient safety: misplaced femoral line guidewire and multiple failures to detect the foreign body on chest radiography.

Authors:  Timothy E Lum; Rollin J Fairbanks; Elliot C Pennington; Frank L Zwemer
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

9.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Brian J Scholl; Erin R Clifford; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.

Authors:  D J Simons; C F Chabris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  17 in total

1.  Strategies for Increasing the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations of Respondent Features: Evidence from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Brady T West; Frauke Kreuter
Journal:  Methodology (Gott)       Date:  2018-04-23

2.  Inattentional deafness in music.

Authors:  Sabrina Koreimann; Bartosz Gula; Oliver Vitouch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-21

3.  Predicting and manipulating the incidence of inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Anne Richards; Emily M Hannon; Nazanin Derakshan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-01-09

4.  Working memory and inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Keith Bredemeier; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

5.  The invisible gorilla strikes again: sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-07-17

6.  You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault.

Authors:  Christopher F Chabris; Adam Weinberger; Matthew Fontaine; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-06-09

7.  The invisible breast cancer: Experience does not protect against inattentional blindness to clinically relevant findings in radiology.

Authors:  Lauren Williams; Ann Carrigan; William Auffermann; Megan Mills; Anina Rich; Joann Elmore; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-11-02

8.  Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Dustin P Calvillo; Russell E Jackson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

9.  Inattentional Blindness and Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities.

Authors:  Carina Kreitz; Philip Furley; Daniel Memmert; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  I Thought I Saw "Zorro": An Inattentional Blindness Study.

Authors:  Bahadır Oktay; Banu Cangöz
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.339

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.