Literature DB >> 19815790

The effects of perceptual load on semantic processing under inattention.

Mika Koivisto1, Antti Revonsuo.   

Abstract

Inattentional blindness refers to a failure to consciously detect an irrelevant object that appears without any expectation when attention is engaged with another task. The perceptual load theory predicts that task-irrelevant stimuli will reach awareness only when the primary task is of low load, which allows processing resources to spill over to processing task-irrelevant stimuli as well. We studied whether perceptual load has an effect on inattentional blindness for a task-irrelevant stimulus whose meaning is or is not relevant to the attentional goals of the observer. In the critical trial, a word appeared without any expectation in the center of a display of attended pictures. The results showed that, under both high and low load, unexpected words belonging to the attended semantic category were detected more often than semantically unrelated words. These results imply that task-irrelevant stimuli, whose meanings are relevant to the observer's task, enter awareness irrespective of perceptual load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815790     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Tony Ro; Charlotte Russell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Independence of visual awareness from attention at early processing stages.

Authors:  Mika Koivisto; Antti Revonsuo; Niina Salminen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  How meaning shapes seeing.

Authors:  Mika Koivisto; Antti Revonsuo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-10

6.  The role of unattended distractors in sustained inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Mika Koivisto; Antti Revonsuo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-07-05

7.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

9.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.

Authors:  Steven B Most; Brian J Scholl; Erin R Clifford; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.

Authors:  D J Simons; C F Chabris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  When Distraction Holds Relevance: A Prospective Memory Benefit for Older Adults.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Animacy, perceptual load, and inattentional blindness.

Authors:  Dustin P Calvillo; Russell E Jackson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.