Literature DB >> 27927926

Clinical and Microbiological Aspects of β-Lactam Resistance in Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Ian H McHardy1, Jennifer Veltman2, Janet Hindler3, Katia Bruxvoort4, Marissa M Carvalho3, Romney M Humphries5.   

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility results from broth microdilution MIC testing of 993 Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates recovered from patients at a tertiary care medical center from 2008 to 2015 were reviewed. Ninety-two oxacillin-susceptible isolates were selected to assess the accuracy of penicillin MIC testing, the penicillin disk diffusion test, and three β-lactamase tests, including the cefoxitin-induced nitrocefin test, penicillin cloverleaf assay, and penicillin disk zone edge test. The results of all phenotypic tests were compared to the results of blaZ PCR. The medical records of 62 patients from whom S. lugdunensis was isolated, including 31 penicillin-susceptible and 31 penicillin-resistant strains, were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the clinical significance of S. lugdunensis isolation, the antimicrobial agents prescribed, if any, and the clinical outcome. MIC testing revealed that 517/993 (52.1%) isolates were susceptible to penicillin and 946/993 (95.3%) were susceptible to oxacillin. The induced nitrocefin test was 100% sensitive and specific for the detection of β-lactamase compared to the blaZ PCR results, whereas the penicillin disk zone edge and cloverleaf tests showed sensitivities of 100% but specificities of only 9.1% and 89.1%, respectively. The penicillin MIC test had 100% categorical agreement with blaZ PCR, while penicillin disk diffusion yielded one major error. Only 3/31 patients with penicillin-susceptible isolates were treated with a penicillin family antimicrobial. The majority of cases were treated with other β-lactams, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or vancomycin. These data indicate that nearly all isolates of S. lugdunensis are susceptible to narrow-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Clinical laboratories in areas with resistance levels similar to those described here can help promote the use of these agents versus vancomycin by effectively designing their antimicrobial susceptibility reports to convey this message.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus; antimicrobial resistance; beta-lactams; lugdunensis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27927926      PMCID: PMC5277529          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02092-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  39 in total

1.  A simple test for penicillinase production in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  I Orstavik; K Odegaard
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1971

Review 2.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Antibiotic resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  D M Livermore
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  In vitro effects of antimicrobial agents on planktonic and biofilm forms of Staphylococcus lugdunensis clinical isolates.

Authors:  Kristi L Frank; Emily J Reichert; Kerryl E Piper; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Clinical experience with Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  John R Ebright; Neelima Penugonda; William Brown
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Acute postoperative endophthalmitis caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Authors:  C Chiquet; A Pechinot; C Creuzot-Garcher; Y Benito; J Croize; S Boisset; J P Romanet; G Lina; F Vandenesch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Significance of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia: report of 28 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  A S Zinkernagel; M S Zinkernagel; M V Elzi; M Genoni; J Gubler; R Zbinden; N J Mueller
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Presence of the bla(Z) beta-lactamase gene in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus that appear penicillin susceptible by conventional phenotypic methods.

Authors:  Rana E El Feghaly; Jennifer E Stamm; Stephanie A Fritz; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  [Evaluation of methods for studying susceptibility to oxacillin and penicillin in 60 Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates].

Authors:  Nínive Batista; M Paula Fernández; Magdalena Lara; Federico Laich; Sebastián Méndez
Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 1.731

10.  Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Staphylococcus lugdunensis: a neglected pathogen of infections involving fracture-fixation devices.

Authors:  Piseth Seng; Madou Traore; Jean-Philippe Lavigne; Laurence Maulin; Jean-Christophe Lagier; Jean-François Thiery; Pierre-Yves Levy; Pierre-Marie Roger; Eric Bonnet; Albert Sotto; Andreas Stein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Tailoring Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing to Individual Species of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: Next Up, Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  C Paul Morris; Patricia J Simner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Staphylococcus lugdunensis as Cause of Septic Pericarditis.

Authors:  Suha Abu Khalaf; Abdallah Mansour; Isma Perveze; Belinda Fender; Daniel R Walker; Dima Dandachi
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec

4.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Authors:  Joanne S K Teh; Ioanna Pantelis; Xiao Chen; Tania Sadlon; Kelly Papanaoum; David L Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 11.677

5.  Comparative Genome Analysis of Staphylococcus lugdunensis Shows Clonal Complex-Dependent Diversity of the Putative Virulence Factor, ess/Type VII Locus.

Authors:  Jérémie Lebeurre; Sandrine Dahyot; Seydina Diene; Amandine Paulay; Marion Aubourg; Xavier Argemi; Jean-Christophe Giard; Isabelle Tournier; Patrice François; Martine Pestel-Caron
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis.

Authors:  Malin Hagstrand Aldman; Lisa I Påhlman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Comparative Genomic Analyses Reveal Potential Factors Responsible for the ST6 Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus lugdunensis Endemic in a Hospital.

Authors:  Shih-Cheng Chang; Lee-Chung Lin; Jang-Jih Lu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Antimicrobial Resistance and Antimicrobial Activity of Staphylococcus lugdunensis Obtained from Two Spanish Hospitals.

Authors:  Rosa Fernández-Fernández; Carmen Lozano; Laura Ruiz-Ripa; Beatriz Robredo; José Manuel Azcona-Gutiérrez; Carla Andrea Alonso; Carmen Aspiroz; Myriam Zarazaga; Carmen Torres
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-22

9.  Coagulase-negative staphylococci: a 20-year study on the antimicrobial resistance profile of blood culture isolates from a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Valéria Cataneli Pereira; Letícia Calixto Romero; Luiza Pinheiro-Hubinger; Adilson Oliveira; Katheryne Benini Martins; Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.257

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.