Literature DB >> 15627187

MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system.

J Kariniemi1, R Blanco Sequeiros, R Ojala, O Tervonen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that when ultrasound (US) guidance is not feasible, abdominal biopsies can be performed safely and accurately under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance in a low-field environment. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy was performed on 31 consecutive patients, in whom US-guided abdominal biopsy was not possible because the lesion was not visualized in US (n=27) or an US-guided procedure was not considered safe (n=4). The locations of the lesions were liver (n=14), pancreas (n=6), lymph node (n=4), retroperitoneal mass (n=3), adrenal gland (n=3) and spleen (n=1). The average size of the lesion was 2.2 cm (range 1-4 cm) in maximum diameter. All procedures were done by using a 0.23-T open-configuration C-arm-shaped MRI scanner with interventional optical tracking equipment and software. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was performed on all 31 patients; 18 patients underwent both FNA biopsy and cutting needle core biopsy. Procedures were evaluated for diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy as well as procedure time and complications. The FNA biopsy specimens were adequate for interpretation in 27 (87%) of 31 cases. Two of these proved to be false-negative findings during follow-up or subsequent biopsy. The final diagnosis was malignant in 15 and benign in 16 patients. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA biopsy were 71, 100 and 81%, respectively. Of the 18 core-needle biopsies, one was determined false-negative owing to nonrepresentativeness. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of histological samples were 90, 100 and 94%, respectively. The needle time was 19 min on average and the mean room time was 1 h 48 min. No immediate or late complications occurred. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy can be performed safely and accurately in a low-field environment in patients for whom an US-guided procedure is not feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15627187     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2566-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

Review 1.  Interventional MR imaging: percutaneous abdominal and skeletal biopsies and drainages of the abdomen.

Authors:  G Adam; A Bücker; C Nolte-Ernsting; J Tacke; R W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MR imaging-guided biopsy and therapeutic intervention in a closed-configuration magnet: single-center series of 361 punctures.

Authors:  E Salomonowitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Low-field MR arthrography of the shoulder joint: technique, indications, and clinical results.

Authors:  K-F Kreitner; R Loew; M Runkel; J Zöllner; M Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Imaging-guided percutaneous abdominal biopsy.

Authors:  G S Gazelle; J R Haaga
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  MR-guided procedures using contemporaneous imaging frameless stereotaxis in an open-configuration system.

Authors:  M H Lee; R B Lufkin; A Borges; D S Lu; S Sinha; K Farahani; P Villabalanca; J Curran; T Hall; D Atkinson; H Kangarloo
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Interactive MR imaging-guided biopsy and aspiration with a modified clinical C-arm system.

Authors:  J S Lewin; C A Petersilge; S F Hatem; J L Duerk; G Lenz; M E Clampitt; M L Williams; K R Kaczynski; C F Lanzieri; A L Wise; J R Haaga
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials.

Authors:  P R Mueller; D D Stark; J F Simeone; S Saini; R J Butch; R R Edelman; J Wittenberg; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy. Fine needle biopsy, cutting needle biopsy, or both?

Authors:  T Tikkakoski; M Päivänsalo; T Siniluoto; S Hiltunen; T Typpö; P Jartti; M Apaja-Sarkkinen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  A wire-sheath system for MR-guided biopsy and drainage: laboratory studies and experience in 10 patients.

Authors:  E vanSonnenberg; P Hajek; V Gylys-Morin; R A Varney; L Baker; G Casola; R Christensen; R F Mattrey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  MR imaging-guided laser ablation of osteoid osteomas with use of optical instrument guidance at 0.23 T.

Authors:  Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Pekka Hyvönen; Alberto Blanco Sequeiros; Lasse Jyrkinen; Risto Ojala; Rauli Klemola; Teuvo Vaara; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  14 in total

1.  Performing MR-guided biopsies in clinical routine: factors that influence accuracy and procedure time.

Authors:  Rüdiger Hoffmann; Christoph Thomas; Hansjörg Rempp; Diethard Schmidt; Philippe L Pereira; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Clasen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MRI-guided biopsy and aspiration in the head and neck: evaluation of 77 patients.

Authors:  Yubo Lü; Ming Liu; Chengli Li; Lebin Wu; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MR-guided liver biopsy within a short, wide-bore 1.5 Tesla MR system.

Authors:  Joerg Stattaus; Stefan Maderwald; Hideo A Baba; Guido Gerken; Joerg Barkhausen; Michael Forsting; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MR-guided biopsies with a newly designed cordless coil in an open low-field system: initial findings.

Authors:  Stephan Zangos; Theodor Vetter; Frank Huebner; Montu Tuwari; Florian Mayer; Katrin Eichler; M-L Hansmann; A Wetter; C Herzog; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Clinical value of CT-guided needle biopsy for retroperitoneal lesions.

Authors:  Yuki Tomozawa; Yoshitaka Inaba; Hidekazu Yamaura; Yozo Sato; Mina Kato; Takaaki Kanamoto; Makoto Sakane
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Evaluation of percutaneous biopsies of renal masses under MRI-guidance: a retrospective study about 26 cases.

Authors:  J Garnon; A Schlier; X Buy; G Tsoumakidou; M de Mathelin; E Breton; A Gangi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Claus Kölblinger; Christiane Kulinna-Cosentini; Andreas Puespoek; Peter Götzinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Intraprocedural diffusion-weighted PROPELLER MRI to guide percutaneous biopsy needle placement within rabbit VX2 liver tumors.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Sumeet Virmani; Guang-Yu Yang; Richard Tang; Gayle Woloschak; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Latest biopsy approach for suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Niikura; Bruno C Odisio; Yutaka Tokuda; Fraser W Symmans; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  MRI-guided percutaneous coaxial cutting needle biopsy of small pulmonary nodules: feasibility.

Authors:  Ming Liu; Yubo Lv; Lebin Wu; Jiqing Song; Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Chengli Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.