Literature DB >> 15626633

E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients' expectations for specific test results?

Glen R Couchman1, Samuel N Forjuoh, Terry G Rascoe, Michael D Reis, Bruce Koehler, Kimberly L van Walsum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess patients' willingness to use e-mail to obtain specific test results, assess their expectations regarding response times, and identify any demographic trends.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of primary care patients was conducted in 19 clinics of a large multi-specialty group practice associated with an 186,000-member Health Maintenance Organization. The outcome measures were proportion of patients with current e-mail access, their willingness to use it for selected general clinical services and to obtain specific test results, and their expectations of timeliness of response.
RESULTS: The majority of patients (58.3%) reported having current e-mail access and indicated strong willingness to use it for communication. However, only 5.8% reported having ever used it to communicate with their physician. Patients were most willing to use e-mail to obtain cholesterol and blood sugar test results, but less willing to use it to obtain brain CT scan results. Patients' expectations of timeliness were generally very high, particularly for high-stakes tests such as brain CT scan. Significant differences of willingness and expectations were found by age group, education, and income.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that most patients are willing to use e-mail to communicate with their primary care providers even for specific test results and that patients will hold providers to high standards of timeliness regarding response. The implication is that integration of e-mail communications into primary care ought to assure prompt and accurate patient access to a plethora of specific clinical services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15626633     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  15 in total

1.  Trends of online patient-provider communication among cancer survivors from 2008 to 2017: a digital divide perspective.

Authors:  Shaohai Jiang; Y Alicia Hong; Piper Liping Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Smartphones in clinical practice: doctors' experience at two Dublin paediatric teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Taha S El Hadidy; Abdulrahman E Alshafei; Alan E Mortell; Eva M Doherty
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 3.  Failure to follow-up test results for ambulatory patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanne L Callen; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Rapid growth in surgeons' use of secure messaging in a patient portal.

Authors:  Jared A Shenson; Robert M Cronin; Sharon E Davis; Qingxia Chen; Gretchen Purcell Jackson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Examining the Multi-level Fit between Work and Technology in a Secure Messaging Implementation.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozkaynak; Sharon Johnson; Stephanie Shimada; Beth Ann Petrakis; Bengisu Tulu; Cliona Archambeault; Gemmae Fix; Erin Schwartz; Susan Woods
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

6.  Designing Asynchronous Communication Tools for Optimization of Patient-Clinician Coordination.

Authors:  Jordan Eschler; Leslie S Liu; Lisa M Vizer; Jennifer B McClure; Paula Lozano; Wanda Pratt; James D Ralston
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 7.  E-mail in patient-provider communication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jiali Ye; George Rust; Yvonne Fry-Johnson; Harry Strothers
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-11-13

8.  Patient and provider perspectives on the potential value and use of a bilingual online patient portal in a Spanish-speaking safety-net population.

Authors:  Alejandro Ochoa; Ken Kitayama; Sebastian Uijtdehaage; Michelle Vermillion; Michael Eaton; Felix Carpio; Martin Serota; Michael E Hochman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  3D visualization as a communicative aid in pharmaceutical advice-giving over distance.

Authors:  Martin Ostlund; Nils Dahlbäck; Göran Ingemar Petersson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Physicians' use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices.

Authors:  Robert G Brooks; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.