Alejandro Ochoa1, Ken Kitayama1, Sebastian Uijtdehaage2, Michelle Vermillion3, Michael Eaton4, Felix Carpio4, Martin Serota4, Michael E Hochman5. 1. UCLA PRIME, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Professor of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Commerce, CA, USA. 5. Gehr Family Center for Implementation Science, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess patient and provider perspectives on the potential value and use of a bilingual patient portal in a large safety-net health system serving predominantly Spanish-speaking patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We captured patient and provider perspectives through the administration of surveys to assess Internet access, barriers, and facilitators to patient portal adoption, along with portal preferences. We report on these survey results using descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: Four hundred patients (82% response rate) and 59 providers (80% response rate) participated in the study. Although 73% of providers believed that the patient portal would increase patient satisfaction, just 39% planned to recommend portal use to patients, citing concerns related to time and reimbursement. In contrast, 72% of patients believed the patient portal would strengthen the patient-provider relationship and 77% believed it would improve the quality of care. Latino patients in particular believed the patient portal would strengthen the patient-provider relationship. Seventy-five percent of patients reported interest in a mobile version of the portal. DISCUSSION: Patients from a safety-net health system, most of whom were Spanish-speaking, reported a high level of interest in the patient portal. Providers at the same health system expressed reluctance about the portal due to concerns related to time and reimbursement. CONCLUSION: Bilingual patient portal implementation has considerable potential to promote health care engagement within Spanish-speaking safety-net populations; however, lack of provider engagement in the process could undermine the effort.
OBJECTIVE: To assess patient and provider perspectives on the potential value and use of a bilingual patient portal in a large safety-net health system serving predominantly Spanish-speaking patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We captured patient and provider perspectives through the administration of surveys to assess Internet access, barriers, and facilitators to patient portal adoption, along with portal preferences. We report on these survey results using descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: Four hundred patients (82% response rate) and 59 providers (80% response rate) participated in the study. Although 73% of providers believed that the patient portal would increase patient satisfaction, just 39% planned to recommend portal use to patients, citing concerns related to time and reimbursement. In contrast, 72% of patients believed the patient portal would strengthen the patient-provider relationship and 77% believed it would improve the quality of care. Latino patients in particular believed the patient portal would strengthen the patient-provider relationship. Seventy-five percent of patients reported interest in a mobile version of the portal. DISCUSSION: Patients from a safety-net health system, most of whom were Spanish-speaking, reported a high level of interest in the patient portal. Providers at the same health system expressed reluctance about the portal due to concerns related to time and reimbursement. CONCLUSION: Bilingual patient portal implementation has considerable potential to promote health care engagement within Spanish-speaking safety-net populations; however, lack of provider engagement in the process could undermine the effort.
Authors: Urmimala Sarkar; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer Y Liu; Nancy E Adler; Robert Nguyen; Andrea López; Dean Schillinger Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Adam Schickedanz; David Huang; Andrea Lopez; Edna Cheung; C R Lyles; Tom Bodenheimer; Urmimala Sarkar Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Urmimala Sarkar; James D Ralston; Nancy Adler; Dean Schillinger; Howard H Moffet; Elbert S Huang; Andrew J Karter Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: James D Ralston; Irl B Hirsch; James Hoath; Mary Mullen; Allen Cheadle; Harold I Goldberg Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Eugene C Nelson; Susan Frampton; Patricia C Dykes; Anupama G Cemballi; Urmimala Sarkar Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Björn Schreiweis; Monika Pobiruchin; Veronika Strotbaum; Julian Suleder; Martin Wiesner; Björn Bergh Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Anshu Abhat; Alejandra Casillas; Anish Mahajan; Gerardo Moreno; Arleen F Brown; Sara Simmons; Peter Szilagyi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Alaa Abd-Alrazaq; Ali Abdallah Alalwan; Brian McMillan; Bridgette M Bewick; Mowafa Househ; Alaa T Al-Zyadat Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 5.428