OBJECTIVE: To review systematically the role of e-mails in patient-provider communication in terms of e-mail content, and perspectives of providers and patients on e-mail communication in health care. METHODS: A systematic review of studies on e-mail communication between patients and health providers in regular health care published from 2000 to 2008. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies were included in the review. Among these studies, 21 studies examined e-mail communication between patients and providers, and three studies examined the e-mail communication between parents of patients in pediatric primary care and pediatricians. In the content analyses of e-mail messages, topics well represented were medical information exchange, medical condition or update, medication information, and subspecialty evaluation. A number of personal and institutional features were associated with the likelihood of e-mail use between patients and providers. While benefits of e-mails in enhancing communication were recognized by both patients and providers, concerns about confidentiality and security were also expressed. CONCLUSION: The e-mail is transforming the relationship between patients and providers. The rigorous exploration of pros and cons of electronic interaction in health care settings will help make e-mail communication a more powerful, mutually beneficial health care provision tool. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is important to develop an electronic communication system for the clinical practice that can address a range of concerns. More efforts need to be made to educate patients and providers to appropriately and effectively use e-mail for communication. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To review systematically the role of e-mails in patient-provider communication in terms of e-mail content, and perspectives of providers and patients on e-mail communication in health care. METHODS: A systematic review of studies on e-mail communication between patients and health providers in regular health care published from 2000 to 2008. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies were included in the review. Among these studies, 21 studies examined e-mail communication between patients and providers, and three studies examined the e-mail communication between parents of patients in pediatric primary care and pediatricians. In the content analyses of e-mail messages, topics well represented were medical information exchange, medical condition or update, medication information, and subspecialty evaluation. A number of personal and institutional features were associated with the likelihood of e-mail use between patients and providers. While benefits of e-mails in enhancing communication were recognized by both patients and providers, concerns about confidentiality and security were also expressed. CONCLUSION: The e-mail is transforming the relationship between patients and providers. The rigorous exploration of pros and cons of electronic interaction in health care settings will help make e-mail communication a more powerful, mutually beneficial health care provision tool. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is important to develop an electronic communication system for the clinical practice that can address a range of concerns. More efforts need to be made to educate patients and providers to appropriately and effectively use e-mail for communication. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Anne F Kittler; Ginny L Carlson; Cathyann Harris; Margaret Lippincott; Lisa Pizziferri; Lynn A Volk; Yamini Jagannath; Jonathan S Wald; David W Bates Journal: Inform Prim Care Date: 2004
Authors: Glen R Couchman; Samuel N Forjuoh; Terry G Rascoe; Michael D Reis; Bruce Koehler; Kimberly L van Walsum Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Crystale Purvis Cooper; Cynthia A Gelb; Sun Hee Rim; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan L Rodriguez; Lindsey Polonec Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Rajesh Girdhari; Paul Krueger; Ri Wang; Christopher Meaney; Sharon Domb; Darren Larsen; Tara Kiran Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Jolie N Haun; Wendy Hathaway; Margeaux Chavez; Nicole Antinori; Brian Vetter; Brian K Miller; Tracey L Martin; Lisa Kendziora; Kim M Nazi; Christine Melillo Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Jordan Eschler; Leslie S Liu; Lisa M Vizer; Jennifer B McClure; Paula Lozano; Wanda Pratt; James D Ralston Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2015-11-05