Jared A Shenson1, Robert M Cronin2,3, Sharon E Davis2, Qingxia Chen2,4, Gretchen Purcell Jackson2,5,6. 1. School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. jared.shenson@gmail.com. 2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 6. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2200 Children's Way, Suite 7100, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of secure messaging through patient portals has risen substantially in recent years due to provider incentives and consumer demand. Secure messaging may increase patient satisfaction and improve outcomes, but also adds to physician workload. Most prior studies of secure messaging focused on primary care and medical specialties. We examined surgeons' use of secure messaging and the contribution of messaging to outpatient interactions in a broadly deployed patient portal. METHODS: We determined the number of clinic visits and secure messages for surgical providers in the first 3 years (2008-2010) after patient portal deployment at an academic medical center. We calculated the proportion of outpatient interaction conducted through messaging for each specialty. Logistic regression models compared the likelihood of message-based versus clinic outpatient interaction across surgical specialties. RESULTS: Over the study period, surgical providers delivered care in 648,200 clinic visits and received 83,912 messages, with more than 200% growth in monthly message volume. Surgical specialties receiving the most messages were orthopedics/podiatry (25.1%), otolaryngology (20.1%), urology (10.8%), and general surgery (9.6%); vascular surgery (0.8%) and pediatric general surgery (0.2%) received the fewest. The proportion of outpatient interactions conducted through secure messaging increased significantly from 5.4% in 2008 to 15.3% in 2010 (p < 0.001) with all specialties experiencing growth. Heart/lung transplantation (74.9%), liver/kidney/pancreas transplantation (69.5%), and general surgery (48.7%) had the highest proportion of message-based outpatient interaction by the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates rapid adoption of online secure messaging across surgical specialties with significant growth in its use for outpatient interaction. Some specialties, particularly those with long-term follow-up, interacted with patients more through secure messaging than in person. As surgeons devote more time to secure messaging, additional research will be needed to understand the care delivered through online interactions and to develop models for reimbursement.
BACKGROUND: Use of secure messaging through patient portals has risen substantially in recent years due to provider incentives and consumer demand. Secure messaging may increase patient satisfaction and improve outcomes, but also adds to physician workload. Most prior studies of secure messaging focused on primary care and medical specialties. We examined surgeons' use of secure messaging and the contribution of messaging to outpatient interactions in a broadly deployed patient portal. METHODS: We determined the number of clinic visits and secure messages for surgical providers in the first 3 years (2008-2010) after patient portal deployment at an academic medical center. We calculated the proportion of outpatient interaction conducted through messaging for each specialty. Logistic regression models compared the likelihood of message-based versus clinic outpatient interaction across surgical specialties. RESULTS: Over the study period, surgical providers delivered care in 648,200 clinic visits and received 83,912 messages, with more than 200% growth in monthly message volume. Surgical specialties receiving the most messages were orthopedics/podiatry (25.1%), otolaryngology (20.1%), urology (10.8%), and general surgery (9.6%); vascular surgery (0.8%) and pediatric general surgery (0.2%) received the fewest. The proportion of outpatient interactions conducted through secure messaging increased significantly from 5.4% in 2008 to 15.3% in 2010 (p < 0.001) with all specialties experiencing growth. Heart/lung transplantation (74.9%), liver/kidney/pancreas transplantation (69.5%), and general surgery (48.7%) had the highest proportion of message-based outpatient interaction by the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates rapid adoption of online secure messaging across surgical specialties with significant growth in its use for outpatient interaction. Some specialties, particularly those with long-term follow-up, interacted with patients more through secure messaging than in person. As surgeons devote more time to secure messaging, additional research will be needed to understand the care delivered through online interactions and to develop models for reimbursement.
Entities:
Keywords:
Consumer health informatics; Patient engagement; Patient portal; Patient–provider communication; Secure messaging; Surgery
Authors: David C Miller; Cathryn Gust; Justin B Dimick; Nancy Birkmeyer; Jonathan Skinner; John D Birkmeyer Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Chandra Y Osborn; S Trent Rosenbloom; Shane P Stenner; Shilo Anders; Sue Muse; Kevin B Johnson; Jim Jirjis; Gretchen Purcell Jackson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-07-31 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Markus Wallwiener; Christian Wilhelm Wallwiener; Julia Katharina Kansy; Harald Seeger; Taufiek Konrad Rajab Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2009 Impact factor: 6.184
Authors: Robert M Cronin; Daniel Fabbri; Joshua C Denny; S Trent Rosenbloom; Gretchen Purcell Jackson Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Michelle A Jahn; Brian W Porter; Himalaya Patel; Alan J Zillich; Steven R Simon; Alissa L Russ Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Michelle M Kelly; Shannon M Dean; Pascale Carayon; Tosha B Wetterneck; Peter L T Hoonakker Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 2.342